Proceedings Second International Conference on Application of Concurrency to System Design
DOI: 10.1109/csd.2001.981762
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correct performance of transaction capabilities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Their requirements are that (1) there is no infinite sequence of progressing τ -actions, (2) non-progressing τ -actions are only executed at a focus point, and (3) a focus point cannot perform progressing τ -actions. A pre-abstraction function divides occurrences of τ -actions in the implementation into progressing and non-progressing ones, and only progressing τ 's are abstracted away; in many cases it is far from trivial to define the proper pre-abstraction.…”
Section: External Actionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Their requirements are that (1) there is no infinite sequence of progressing τ -actions, (2) non-progressing τ -actions are only executed at a focus point, and (3) a focus point cannot perform progressing τ -actions. A pre-abstraction function divides occurrences of τ -actions in the implementation into progressing and non-progressing ones, and only progressing τ 's are abstracted away; in many cases it is far from trivial to define the proper pre-abstraction.…”
Section: External Actionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The µCRL toolset [7] supports the generation of labeled transition systems of µCRL specifications, together with reduction modulo branching bisimulation equivalence and model checking of temporal logic formulas. This approach has been used to analyze a wide range of protocols and distributed systems (e.g., [1,18,31,33]). …”
Section: Definition 1 (Labeled Transition System) a Labeled Transitimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to use the state space generation tool for µCRL, a 'compiler' had been developed in an earlier project [2]. At the time this compiler was developed, we chose for µCRL over LOTOS, because we had more experience with it [3] and we were impressed by the little redundance it produced in the generation of the state space. The language µCRL and LOTOS are very similar though.…”
Section: Erlang To µCrlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…µCRL and its toolset have been successfully used to analyze a wide range of protocols and distributed systems (e.g., [1,7,10,13,19]). …”
Section: µCrlmentioning
confidence: 99%