1998
DOI: 10.1017/cbo9780511804489
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Corpus Linguistics

Abstract: This book is about investigating the way people use language in speech and writing. It introduces the corpus-based approach to linguistics, based on analysis of large databases of real language examples stored on computer. Each chapter focuses on a different area of linguistics, including lexicography, grammar, discourse, register variation, language acquisition, and historical linguistics. Example analyses are presented in each chapter to provide concrete descriptions of the research methods and advantages of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
168
0
16

Year Published

2003
2003
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 999 publications
(187 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
168
0
16
Order By: Relevance
“…Will which is supposed to be given the most emphasis in a pedagogic corpus reaches second while can that is ranked third in three major corpora has been overused by standing as the most frequent modal used in the textbook. Indeed, can is well overrepresented throughout Form 1 to 5 textbooks because although it is among the top four used modal auxiliaries, it is well below will and would in terms of frequency occurrence (Leech et al 2009;Biber et al 1998). It is interesting to see that although based on KBSM curriculum modals must, will, may, might and should are the ones that are stipulated to be taught in Form 1, Form 4 and Form 5 textbook, still modal can is used more than any other modals.…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Will which is supposed to be given the most emphasis in a pedagogic corpus reaches second while can that is ranked third in three major corpora has been overused by standing as the most frequent modal used in the textbook. Indeed, can is well overrepresented throughout Form 1 to 5 textbooks because although it is among the top four used modal auxiliaries, it is well below will and would in terms of frequency occurrence (Leech et al 2009;Biber et al 1998). It is interesting to see that although based on KBSM curriculum modals must, will, may, might and should are the ones that are stipulated to be taught in Form 1, Form 4 and Form 5 textbook, still modal can is used more than any other modals.…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, shall as the lowest frequent modal is lopsided throughout Malaysian textbooks. Although shall has been reported by Biber et al (1998) and Leech et al (2009) to be obsolete in current English, according to Mindt (1995) and Romer (2004a) the prediction meaning of shall (31%) is among one of the most widely used meanings in spoken British English. In the ESL environment, students need to be exposed to the language as much as possible to gain sufficient input and exposure.…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hunston (2003) holds that it is no exaggeration to say that corpora and the study of corpora have revolutionized the study of language, and of the applications of language over the last few decades, and that the improved accessibility of computers has changed corpus study from a subject for specialists to something that is open to all. According to Biber et al (1998), the essential characteristics that capture the corpus-based approach are the followings: (1) it is empirical, analyzing the actual patterns of use in natural texts; (2) it utilizes a large and principled collection of natural texts, known as a 'corpus', as the basis for analysis; (3) it makes extensive use of computers for analysis, using both automatic and interactive techniques; (4) it depends on both quantitative and qualitative analytical techniques.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dentro da abordagem da Linguística de Corpus (doravante LC) (Biber et al, 1998;Berber Sardinha, 2004) com relação à categoria dos pacotes lexicais, encontramos os seguintes trabalhos: (i) Hyland (2008), que examinou um corpus a partir de registros acadêmicos escritos de quatro diferentes disciplinas (Engenharia Elétrica, Biologia, Administração de Empresas e Linguística Aplicada) a fi m de extrair pacotes lexicais baseados numa análise contrastiva das suas formas e funções; (ii) Scott e Tribble (2006) …”
Section: Introductionunclassified