2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2017.10.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Corporate taxes and vertical tax externalities: Evidence from narrative federal tax shocks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We exploit these features in the empirical analysis. Last, the focus on Romer and Romer's (2010) sample yields a clearer link to the existing related literature, in which several studies similarly focused on this set of federal tax changes, including Mertens and Ravn (2012), Mertens and Ravn (2013), Perez-Sebastian et al (2019) and Reingewertz (2018).…”
Section: Federal Tax Changes and Voting Datamentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We exploit these features in the empirical analysis. Last, the focus on Romer and Romer's (2010) sample yields a clearer link to the existing related literature, in which several studies similarly focused on this set of federal tax changes, including Mertens and Ravn (2012), Mertens and Ravn (2013), Perez-Sebastian et al (2019) and Reingewertz (2018).…”
Section: Federal Tax Changes and Voting Datamentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Note that the former group may include tax changes that affect other tax bases (i.e., labour) as well, as long as capital is affected. In effect, this division methodology follows that employed in Reingewertz (2018). From the 50 tax changes studied, (29) 21 tax changes are classified as (non-)capital-related.…”
Section: Capital Divisionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We exploit these features in the empirical analysis. Last, the focus on RR's sample yields a clearer link to the existing related literature, in which several studies similarly focused on this set of federal tax changes, including Mertens and Ravn (2012), Mertens and Ravn (2013), Perez-Sebastian, Raveh, and Reingewertz (2016), and Reingewertz (2018).…”
Section: Federal Tax Changes and Voting Datamentioning
confidence: 97%
“…labor) as well, as long as capital is a¤ected. In e¤ect, this division methodology follows that employed in Reingewertz (2018). From the 50 tax changes studied, (32) 18 tax changes are classi…ed as (non-)capital-related.…”
Section: Capital Divisionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The paper relates to three strands of literature. First, the empirical literature on vertical tax externalities, including Besley and Rosen (1998), Devereux, Lockwood, and Redoano (2007), Esteller-More and Sole-Olle (2001), Fredriksson and Mamum (2008), Goodspeed (2000), Hayashi and Boadway (2001), Hoyt (2001) and Reingewertz (2018), which examine the e¤ects of various federal tax shocks on di¤erent tax bases over multiple time periods and countries. The …ndings of these studies are jointly inconclusive, providing opposing evidence on the sign of the vertical tax externality.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%