2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2016.10.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Corporate social responsibility in junior and mid-tier resources companies operating in developing nations – beyond the public relations offensive

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They found systematic differences in responses across the four countries, which suggest that specific political, cultural and other institutions may have been responsible. In the study by Lyons (2016), it was established that there is an increasing social anticipation that institutions, particularly those working in developing nations, have a duty not to simply generate profit but also to ensure the growth in the community they are working.…”
Section: Development Of Hypothesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They found systematic differences in responses across the four countries, which suggest that specific political, cultural and other institutions may have been responsible. In the study by Lyons (2016), it was established that there is an increasing social anticipation that institutions, particularly those working in developing nations, have a duty not to simply generate profit but also to ensure the growth in the community they are working.…”
Section: Development Of Hypothesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Local stakeholders are seen as key actors because of their proximity to the project and because people living in the area are most affected by the operations. If they oppose the project, this may cause delays and increase operator costs (Franks et al 2014;Lyons et al 2016;Prno 2013;Prno and Slocombe 2012;Thomson and Joyce 1997). Local criticism, possibly supported by national NGOs, can delegitimize a project and lead to the withdrawal of investors, thereby ending the project (Eggert 2010;Franks et al 2014;Thomson and Joyce 1997).…”
Section: Discussion: Social Aspects Of Business Risk In Mineral Explo...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While considerable research has explored the SLO in mining, literature on the social license to explore (SLE) is relatively scarce (for exceptions, see, e.g., Beland Lindahl et al 2021;Caron et al 2016;Eerola 2017;Luning 2012;Lyons et al 2016;MacKenzie et al 2020;Suopajärvi et al 2019b;Thomson and Joyce 1997). This is not to say that social licensing at the exploration stage is unimportant-quite the contrary.…”
Section: Local Acceptability Risk For Mineral Explorationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is no universal definition of a junior mining company and considerable debate surrounds the criteria that classify a company as a junior miner. Much of the critical literature (Dougherty 2011(Dougherty , 2013Lyons et al 2016) and the online financial guidance (Anon. 2019) focuses on junior gold miners.…”
Section: The Precarity and Culture Of Junior Minersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter appears to be a function of the decision by many of the 'senior' companies to cut back on exploration spending around the turn of the millennium. However, what matters for the purpose of this chapter is the way that juniors are defined by their entitlement to specific state subsidies; yet they typically underperform in terms of social and environmental responsibility compared to larger mining companies (Dougherty 2013: 3;Lyons et al 2016). Noting, of course, the obvious caveat that major companies do not always meet their own CSR commitments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%