2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.bushor.2006.12.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Corporate social responsibility: Doing well by doing good

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
219
0
13

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 366 publications
(237 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
5
219
0
13
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Falck and Heblich [18], the instrumental approach can provide the firm with advantages to identify trends or market changes, enabling it to act swiftly in order to stabilize itself and be in the vanguard of change. It can also help firms to proactively construct competences via the analysis of their skills, processes, and systems.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Falck and Heblich [18], the instrumental approach can provide the firm with advantages to identify trends or market changes, enabling it to act swiftly in order to stabilize itself and be in the vanguard of change. It can also help firms to proactively construct competences via the analysis of their skills, processes, and systems.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given resources and objectives, the assumption is that the firm is generally unable to meet any social instances. Consequently, the emerging of a prioritization process of CSR domains overlaps with a stakeholder management approach (Bansal et al, 2015) in order "to answer the question of which stakeholders should be considered and… how much is at stake" (Falck & Heblich, 2007). Therefore, an ex-ante selection activity conducted by company represents what Porter and Kramer called the "acid test" for assessing the presence or absence of an effective CSR strategy (Porter & Kramer, 2006) whic h aims at addressing social issues, while providing the organization with some business benefits (Bhattacharyya et al, 2008).…”
Section: Governance Modes Of Strategic Csrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In furthering the concept of organization "value" Fairbrass (2006) harks back to the neo-classical economists such as Friedman (1962) and also notes Carroll's (1999) view that social goals are valuable in their own right and not subordinate to economic goals. These historical views of CSR can be categorized into three areas (Falck & Heblich, 2007) (Furrer et al, 2010). On the other hand, individuals in Central and Eastern European countries are less willing to sacrifice future opportunities to personal prosperity for the sake of social values.…”
Section: Scope Of Csrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Equally, this can be traced to levels of responsibility expected of business (Falck & Heblich, 2007). For example, Málovics et al (2009) categorize CSR into "must responsibilities" that are couched in legal minimums, "should responsibilities" that are derived from societal norms, and "can responsibilities" that move beyond legal minimums and social expectations.…”
Section: Legislationmentioning
confidence: 99%