Corporate social responsibility as an employee governance tool: Evidence from a quasi‐experiment

Abstract

Research summary: This study examines whether companies employ corporate social responsibility (CSR) to improve employee engagement and mitigate adverse behavior at the workplace (e.g., shirking, absenteeism). We exploit plausibly exogenous changes in state unemployment insurance (UI) benefits from 1991 to 2013. Higher UI benefits reduce the cost of being unemployed and hence increase employees' incentives to engage in adverse behavior. We find that higher UI benefits are associated with higher engagement in employee‐related CSR. This finding suggests that companies use CSR as a strategic management tool—specifically, an employee governance tool—to increase employee engagement and counter the possibility of adverse behavior. We further examine plausible mechanisms underlying this relationship. Managerial summary: This study examines whether companies employ corporate social responsibility (CSR) to improve employee engagement and mitigate adverse behavior at the workplace (e.g., shirking, absenteeism). We find that companies react to increased risk of adverse behavior by strategically increasing their investment in employee‐related CSR (e.g., work‐life balance benefits, health and safety policies). Our findings have important managerial implications. In particular, they suggest that CSR may help companies motivate and engage their employees. Hence, companies dealing with employees that are unmotivated, regularly absent, or engage in other forms of adverse behavior, may find it worthwhile to design and implement effective CSR practices. Further, our findings suggest that CSR can be used as employee governance tool. Accordingly, managers could benefit from integrating CSR considerations into their strategic planning. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Green Process Innovation and Innovation Benefit: The Mediating Effect of Firm Image

“…Green process innovation can prove a firm is acting with social responsibility [52][53][54]. These practices are perceived to be sincere by external stakeholders [55]. Firm's image is defined as the current image of the firm in the minds of the public [6].…”

Private action in public interest: The comparative governance of social issues

“…The role of for‐profit businesses in addressing social problems—climate change, disease, hunger, poverty, exploitation, and so on—is a topic of growing interest in the field of strategic management (Barney, ; George, Howard‐Grenville, Joshi, & Tihanyi, ; Mahoney, McGahan, & Pitelis, ). Building on an early emphasis on the ethical imperative for firms to recognize and take responsibility for the broader consequences of their actions (Freeman, ; Hinings & Greenwood, ; Stern & Barley, ), the literature has increasingly come to emphasize the strategic value of socially responsible actions (Dorobantu, Kaul, & Zelner, ; Flammer & Luo, ; McWilliams & Siegel, ). While this work provides strong evidence for a positive link between corporate social responsibility (CSR) and firm financial performance (Barnett & Salomon, ; Flammer, ; Henisz, Dorobantu, & Nartey, ; King & Lenox, ; Waddock & Graves, ), it is far from clear that such activities truly contribute to social welfare (Barnett, ; Jones et al, ; Kaul & Luo, ).…”

Competing for government procurement contracts: The role of corporate social responsibility

“…In this vein, it has been shown that CSR can help companies differentiate themselves from their foreign and local competitors (Fernandez‐Kranz & Santalo, ; Flammer, ) and from other employers (Flammer & Luo, ).…”

“…In this vein, it has been shown that CSR can help companies differentiate themselves from their foreign and local competitors (Fernandez-Kranz & Santalo, 2010;Flammer, 2015b) and from other employers (Flammer & Luo, 2017). 10 In a seminal article, Spence (1973) shows that costly signals are more credible, as they are harder (i.e., costlier) to mimic.…”