Corporate social responsibility and firm market performance: the role of product market competition and firm life cycle

Abstract

PurposeThis study empirically investigates the role of product market competition and mature-stage firm life cycle on the relation between corporate social responsibility (CSR) and market performance in an emerging market context – Malaysia.Design/methodology/approachThe authors construct a comprehensive CSR index toward the economy, environment and society (EES) and apply both Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) and Two-Stage Least Squares (2SLS) instrumental variables (IV) approaches to test the hypotheses of the study.FindingsThe authors find that EES-based CSR generally enhances firms' market performance; however, the level of product market competition undermines the market performance of socially and economically responsible firms. In addition, the study results indicate that mature-stage firm life cycle with more involvement in CSR activities shows better market performance. However, the endogeneity check of CSR suggests that both CSR and mature-stage firms are mutually exclusive in influencing market performance. The study findings are robust to alternative measures and different identifications of high and low default risk situations of sample firms.Practical implicationsThis study carries practical policy implications for the listed firms, regulators and stakeholders in general. For example, regulatory bodies may promote greater involvement in CSR activities by listed companies in the Malaysian stock market. Investors and other market participants should be aware of factors influencing socially responsible firms' market performance such as the corporate life cycle and the level of competition in product markets.Originality/valueThis research work responds to the call of regulatory bodies in Malaysia at a time when the Malaysian economy is under threat of environmental distraction practices by the palm oil industry and import ban by the largest export market, i.e. the European Union by 2030. The study also contributes to the theoretical literature by refining the moderating role of product market competition and mature-stage life cycle on the relationship between CSR and market performance from the perspectives of resource-based and stakeholder theories in emerging economy settings.

Does managerial short-termism always matter in a firm's corporate social responsibility performance? Evidence from China

“…Managers take the condition of product market competition into account in all their strategic decisions, including decisions about corporate social responsibility [ 102 ]. There are two views proposed in the literature regarding the role of product market competition on a firm's CSR engagement.…”

Firm's value and ESG: the moderating role of ownership concentration and corporate disclosures

“…In addition, they find negative moderation in the presence of any employee as a director on the board of directors. ESG also gives tax benefits which results in improved firm's value (Al-Dhamari et al. , 2022; Guedrib and Marouani, 2023).…”

Nexus between mandatory ESG disclosure regulation and abnormal stock returns: a study of an emerging economy

“…“win-win” (Porter and Van der Linde, 1995) and “win-lose” (Friedman, 1970). The first approach recognizes the positive effects of disclosures such as lower agency conflicts (Easley and O'hara, 2004), tax benefits (Al-Dhamari et al , 2022; Guedrib and Marouani, 2023) and increased reputation (Wong and Zhang, 2022). On the contrary, the latter approach considers ESG disclosures as an additional burden due to preparation and dissemination costs (Wang et al , 2023), leakage of vital information (Grewal et al , 2019) and legitimacy risk (Rogers et al , 2011).…”