“CORPORATE SECURITY BEGINS IN THE COMMUNITY”: Mining, the Corporate Social Responsibility Industry, and Environmental Advocacy in Indonesia

Abstract

In 2002, male village leaders and youth living near a transnational mining corporation's operation in rural Indonesia attacked a group of visiting environmental activists. I analyze the moral commitments of the corporate managers who provoked the attack and the village elites who organized and executed it, turning to the context of the burgeoning Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) industry to grasp the broader dimensions of the beliefs and practices through which managers and elites legitimized their actions. This essay shows that the CSR industry is coevolving alongside environmental advocacy campaigns and grassroots corporate security models.

Special Issue: Population and Development: Comparative Anthropological Perspectives

“…Anthropological accounts of CSR and private sector development efforts generally paint a highly critical picture (Watts 2005;Welker 2009;Leonard 2010). …”

The Marketization of Poverty

“…Because the capitalist system and its market incentives result in people with the greatest needs receiving the smallest benefits of the global economy, Gates (2008) called for a "system innovation" or "refinement" to ensure that capitalism will serve those who cannot pay for what it offers. His proposed solution, to complement the profit incentive with a "recognition" incentive that would materialize in enhanced company reputation, customer appeal, and employee attraction, is actually part of the business case that corporate social responsibility (CSR) advocates have been making for years (Welker 2009). More interestingly, Gates (2008) also argued for "an approach where government, businesses and nonprofits work together to stretch the reach of market forces .…”

The Anthropology of Extraction: Critical Perspectives on the Resource Curse

“…From the oilfields of Ecuador, to the goldmines of Papua New Guinea this strand of critically-engaged anthropology collectively highlights how corporations use the language and practice of ethics to contain and respond to different kinds of challenges and conflicts generated by their activities, from ecological/environmental crisis, to labour rights and local expectations of jobs, from dependency and Dutch disease to corruption and conflict over resources (Welker 2014, Kirsch 2011, Rajak 2011a, Sydow 2016. As CSR serves to better ease the incursion of TNCs and the extraction of local resources (Sawyer 2007: 7), corporate-community partnerships can provide new 34 channels/vehicles for patronage, elite-acting/corruption, dependency and control (Welker 2009, Rajak 2011a, Jones 2007, Gardner 2012. By exploring both the intended and unintended effects of these processes empirically, this body of work shows how, in practice, the very same instruments that are proffered as solutions to the resource curse have a productive power to reinscribe relations of authority and dependence between both extractive companies and national governments, as well as development donors, and the localities in which they operate.…”