Corporate risk and the humpback of CEO narcissism

Abstract

Purpose -The purpose of this paper is to investigate the association between CEO narcissism and corporate risk taking. Design/methodology/approach -The authors provide a novel and unobtrusive measure of CEO narcissism based on LinkedIn profiling. The authors investigate the relationship between CEO narcissism and corporate risk taking (stock return volatility) for a sample of 475 US manufacturing firms in the period 2010-2014. Findings -The authors find an inverse U-shape relationship between CEO narcissism and stock return volatility. The inverse U-shape relationship (the "humpback") is caused by the paradoxical nature of the narcissistic personality in which the self-esteem is high but at the same time fragile with a combination of self-admiration and a constant need of having this positive self-view confirmed. The results are robust to alternative specifications of CEO narcissism and corporate risk taking. The results are economically meaningful. Thus, a moderate degree of CEO narcissismas compared to a very low or a very high level of CEO narcissismis associated with an increase in corporate risk taking of approximately 12 percent. Originality/value -Previous literature provides multiple analyses on the association between managerial overconfidence and corporate decisions. As opposed to overconfidence, narcissism is a personality trait having both cognitive and behavioral dimensions. This paper provides a novel contribution to the growing literature on the association between managerial biases/traits and corporate decision-making.

Watch me go big: CEO narcissism and corporate acquisitions

“…The vulnerable side of narcissism could have altered the results. Thus, Aabo and Eriksen (2018) show that very narcissistic CEOs take less risk than moderately narcissistic CEOs. Furthermore, Aabo et al (2020) show that a high amount of narcissistic supply (large firm and high compensation) moderates the risk taking by narcissistic CEOs.…”

“…Narcissistic CEOs are not risk seekers per se (Aabo and Eriksen, 2018). Thus, Jauk et al (2017) find that high levels of grandiose narcissism are likely to be accompanied by narcissistic vulnerability and Gore and Widiger (2016) find that grandiose narcissists are likely to display episodes of vulnerable narcissism.…”

Do narcissistic CEOs rock the boat?

“…Both measures are stable across the 10-yr period with yearly average ranges of 0.25-0.27 and 2.19-2.24, respectively (with a small downward trend, if any). The alternative measure for CEO narcissism based on press releases was used by Chatterjee and Hambrick (2007) in their index for CEO narcissism and has subsequently been used by Chatterjee and Hambrick (2011); Aabo and Eriksen (2018), among others. The press release is an instrument for the CEO to tell the investors, analysts, media, etc.…”

Recruiting, selecting, retaining, and monitoring successful investment managers: A review of a scattered literature

“…In this regard, there have been a number of recent studies looking at the dark-side and corporate affairs. Aabo and Erikson (2018) hypothesized and demonstrated that there is an inverse U relationship between a CEO's Narcissism and company stock return volatility. In short, Narcissists take more risks which can be both advantageous and disadvantageous depending on the situation.…”