The Handbook of Communication and Corporate Reputation 2013
DOI: 10.1002/9781118335529.ch45
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Corporate Reputation and Return on Investment (ROI): Measuring the Bottom‐Line Impact of Reputation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Corporate image has been a notoriously difficult construct for communication scholars to conceptualize, in large part, because image has been used in a variety of disparate contexts and is often conflated with similar concepts, in particular identity and reputation (Kim and Yang, 2013; Nekmat et al , 2014; Gotsi and Wilson, 2001; Alvesson, 1990; Grunig, 1993; Gilpin, 2010; Cornelissen, 2000; Cian and Cervai, 2014).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Corporate image has been a notoriously difficult construct for communication scholars to conceptualize, in large part, because image has been used in a variety of disparate contexts and is often conflated with similar concepts, in particular identity and reputation (Kim and Yang, 2013; Nekmat et al , 2014; Gotsi and Wilson, 2001; Alvesson, 1990; Grunig, 1993; Gilpin, 2010; Cornelissen, 2000; Cian and Cervai, 2014).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, scholars have generally distinguished the two in a variety of ways. The most common are that reputation represents an aggregation of all stakeholder opinions, whereas image reflects the judgment of only an individual; that reputation constitutes a judgment made over time, whereas image evaluations occur more in isolated moments; and that reputational assessments are relatively enduring and stable, whereas perceptions of image can be more fleeting (Nekmat et al , 2014; Cian and Cervai, 2014; Gotsi and Wilson, 2001; Alvesson, 1990; Cornelissen, 2000; Kim and Yang, 2013).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%