Corporate Payments Networks and Credit Risk Rating

Abstract

Aggregate and systemic risk in complex systems are emergent phenomena depending on two properties: the idiosyncratic risks of the elements and the topology of the network of interactions among them. While a significant attention has been given to aggregate risk assessment and risk propagation once the above two properties are given, less is known about how the risk is distributed in the network and its relations with the topology. We study this problem by investigating a large proprietary dataset of payments among 2.4M Italian firms, whose credit risk rating is known. We document significant correlations between local topological properties of a node (firm) and its risk. Moreover we show the existence of an homophily of risk, i.e. the tendency of firms with similar risk profile to be statistically more connected among themselves. This effect is observed when considering both pairs of firms and communities or hierarchies identified in the network. We leverage this knowledge to show the predictability of the missing rating of a firm using only the network properties of the associated node.keyword financial networks -corporate networks -credit risk -credit rating -machine learning JEL classification:

Multiview Graph Learning for Small‐ and Medium‐Sized Enterprises’ Credit Risk Assessment in Supply Chain Finance

“…where D is a diagonal matrix given by 2) , and the normalized graph Laplacian is denoted as follows:…”

“…Compared with banks and core enterprises, SMEs are more prone to encounter credit risk. In the SCF system, once the credit risk occurs, the credit status of enterprises in the chain will be magnified and even spread to the whole supply chain due to the connectivity of the supply chain [2][3][4]. However, credit risk is inevitable.…”

Latent Factor Models for Credit Scoring in P2P Systems

“…We claim that the inclusion of network information can improve loan default predictions, as it captures information that reflects underlying common features, that cannot be otherwise observed. For related works see Wilson and Sharda (1994) and Letizia and Lillo (2018). Besides improving predictive accuracy, a network representation can also provide valuable "descriptive" insights on the interconnectedness between companies participating in the P2P platform, identifying participants which are central to the network and, therefore, most important from a systemic risk perspective.…”

Factorial Network Models to Improve P2P Credit Risk Management

“…Network models have been shown to be effective in gauging the vulnerabilities among financial institutions for risk transmission (see Battiston et al, 2012 ; Billio et al, 2012 ; Diebold and Yilmaz, 2014 ; Ahelegbey et al, 2016a ), and a scheme to complement micro-prudential supervision with macro-prudential surveillance to ensure financial stability (see IMF, 2011 ; Moghadam and Viñals, 2010 ; Viñals et al, 2012 ). Recent application of networks have been shown to improve loan default predictions and capturing information that reflects underlying common features (see Letizia and Lillo, 2018 ; Ahelegbey et al, 2019 ).…”