2016
DOI: 10.1080/10584609.2016.1142489
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Corporate Ownership and News Bias Revisited: Newspaper Coverage of the Supreme Court’s Citizens United Ruling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results speak directly to the literature on the influence of media ownership on the political content of the news produced by a media organization. This research program has found that the ownership of a media outlet determines how that outlet covers campaigns and candidates (Branton and Dunaway 2009; Dunaway and Lawrence 2015) and how the outlet slants its coverage away from issues potentially damaging to the ownership’s political or financial interests (Bailard 2016; Gilens and Hertzman 2000). We provide additional support for these claims, documenting a substantial shift in topics covered and ideological slant of political coverage as a product of ownership change.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These results speak directly to the literature on the influence of media ownership on the political content of the news produced by a media organization. This research program has found that the ownership of a media outlet determines how that outlet covers campaigns and candidates (Branton and Dunaway 2009; Dunaway and Lawrence 2015) and how the outlet slants its coverage away from issues potentially damaging to the ownership’s political or financial interests (Bailard 2016; Gilens and Hertzman 2000). We provide additional support for these claims, documenting a substantial shift in topics covered and ideological slant of political coverage as a product of ownership change.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consolidation changes the incentives of news providers, shifting coverage toward the topics that can be distributed in multiple markets rather than those—such as local politics—that are market-specific. Consolidation among conglomerate owners is also correlated with changes in editorial decisions, where the newly consolidated outlets are more likely to produce the content that favors the political and financial interests of their owners (Bailard 2016; Gilens and Hertzman 2000). These content changes influence viewers’ available information about local elections and elected officials, along with the ideological slant of news to which they are exposed.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Media reporting on specific events, such as the US Supreme Court rulings or electoral campaigns, has been shown to vary depending on the financial interests of their corporate owners (e.g. Bailard, 2016;Dunaway & Lawrence, 2015;Hughes & Lawson, 2005;Markus & Charnysh, 2017). Wegenast and Schneider's (2017) study of deposits of natural resources in sub-Saharan Africa reveals that state repression as answer to societal dissent is particularly likely if oil fields are majority-owned by international companies (cf.…”
Section: Conceptualizing Ownership As Variable In Political Science R...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, it was found that CNN covered issues regarding Time Warner products more positively than those of other corporations (Williams, 2002) so that throughout the day, audiences were frequently exposed to promotional news that benefits the news organization or its corporate owner at the expense of news that informs viewers of national and international issues. In addition, news subsidiaries may selectively avoid reporting news that is controversial in favor of business interests of their parent corporation (Archer and Clinton, 2017; Bailard, 2016).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, changes observed in news content, such as self-coverage and cross-promotion of activities, raise concerns about potential conflict of interest because cross-owned media companies may be advancing their own business interests at the expense of the public’s need for knowledge about national and international issues (Davis and Craft, 2000; Terry, 2013). Due to limitations of time and space, newspaper organizations that depend on circulation and advertising revenue for financial stability must decide how best to balance profit-making pursuits against their social duty to report issues that the public needs to know to maintain a healthy democracy (Archer and Clinton, 2017; Bailard, 2016; McAllister, 2002). Thus, self-promotion by cross-owned corporations raises issues of possible conflict of interest at the institutional level when media companies in their role as employers are able to socialize journalists, as employees, to cover news that benefits their own companies at the expense of reporting information in the public interest (Turow, 1994).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%