2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2014.09.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Corporate hedging and the cost of debt

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
87
1
6

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(100 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
6
87
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Judge (2006) finds a robust relationship between financial distress costs and foreign currency hedging decisions, which is much stronger than in many previous studies in the UK. Recently, Chen and King (2014) examined 1832 non-financial American firms and present significant evidence that is consistent with financial distress cost arguments. In contrast, Charumathi and Kota (2012) state that no evidence exists to support this hypothesis.…”
Section: Literature On Firm Specifics and Derivative Usementioning
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Judge (2006) finds a robust relationship between financial distress costs and foreign currency hedging decisions, which is much stronger than in many previous studies in the UK. Recently, Chen and King (2014) examined 1832 non-financial American firms and present significant evidence that is consistent with financial distress cost arguments. In contrast, Charumathi and Kota (2012) state that no evidence exists to support this hypothesis.…”
Section: Literature On Firm Specifics and Derivative Usementioning
confidence: 61%
“…Chen and King (2014) find evidence to support agency costs of debt theory. Yet Charumathi and Kota (2012) do not find evidence in support of the agency cost of debt hypothesis.…”
Section: Literature On Firm Specifics and Derivative Usementioning
confidence: 83%
“…Graham and Rogers (2002) report that hedging helps increase debt capacity, leading to an average 1.1% increase in firm value. Chen and King (2014) confirm that the bond yield spread for derivatives users is lower than for non-users. Gay et al (2011) report that firms using derivatives have a lower cost of equity than non-users.…”
Section: Financial Hedging and Firm Valuesupporting
confidence: 55%
“…However, corporate risk management becomes valuable due to the existence of market imperfections in practice. Several motivations of corporate financial hedging have been developed in previous literature, including reductions in financial distress costs (Mayers and Smith, 1982;Stulz, 1984;Smith and Stulz, 1985), the alleviation of information asymmetry (DeMarzo and Duffe, 1995), the mitigation of agency costs associated with underinvestment and risk shifting (Stulz, 1984;Froot et al, 1993;Leland, 1998), reductions in the cost of debt (Chen and King, 2014), reductions in the cost of equity (Gay et al, 2011), and the alleviation of effective tax payments (Graham and Rogers, 2002). Survey results also suggest that academics commonly support the view that corporate financial hedging generally helps firms manage risks efficiently and increases shareholder value.…”
Section: Financial Hedging and Firm Valuementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In line with previous studies (Allayannis and Weston, 2001;Davis, 2009;Hu and Wee, 2010;Bartram, Brown, and Conrad, 2011;Chen and King, 2014;Mishra, 2015;Kim, Papanastassiou, and Nguyen, 2017), this study adopts Tobin's Q as a proxy of firm value. Tobin's Q is the market value of assets divided by replacement cost.…”
Section: Firm Valuementioning
confidence: 73%