Corporate headquarters in the twenty-first century: an organization design perspective

Abstract

The corporate headquarters (CHQ) of the multi-business enterprise, which emerged as the dominant organizational form for the conduct of business in the twentieth century, has attracted considerable scholarly attention. As the business environment undergoes a fundamental transition in the twenty-first century, we believe that understanding the evolving role of the CHQ from an organization design perspective will offer unique insights into the nature of business activity in the future. The purpose of this article, in keeping with the theme of the Journal of Organization Design Special Collection, is thus to invigorate research into the CHQ. We begin by explicating four canonical questions related to the design of the CHQ. We then survey fundamental changes in the business environment occurring in the twenty-first century, and discuss their potential implications for CHQ design. When suitable here we also refer to the contributions published in our Special Collection. Finally, we put forward recommendations for advancements and new directions for future research to foster a deeper and broader understanding of the topic. We believe that we are on the cusp of a change in the CHQ as radical as that which saw its initial emergence in the late nineteenth/early twentieth century. Exactly what form that change will take remains for practitioners and researchers to inform.

Strategic Decision Making in the Digital Age: Expert Sentiment and Corporate Capital Allocation

“…If corporate decision makers consider rich information, the corporate headquarters’ ability to collect, process, and analyse this information more effectively becomes a central competitive capability. Recent research on corporate headquarters suggests that data analytics is becoming a new strategic task for corporate managers (Birkinshaw, 2018; Kunisch et al, 2020). This development supports the rationale for establishing a corporate function dedicated to digitalization, competitive intelligence, and data analytics.…”

Complexity and multinationals

“…These results connect MNCs' hierarchical structure with institutional imperfections that give rise to the emergence of firms in the first place. Several other studies have also examined how MNCs may use regional or divisional headquarters to manage the complexity of their global operations (Benito et al, 2011;Birkinshaw et al, 2006;Lunnan et al, 2011;Rugman & Verbeke, 2004;Valentino et al, 2019; see also Kunisch et al, 2020). TO THE SPECIAL ISSUE This Special Issue comprises six research articles that explore different facets of complexity in MNCs.…”

History Matters: Colonial-Based Connectivity and Foreign Headquarter Location Choice

“…Lately, the second and the third roles (boundary spanner and bridgehead), are becoming very relevant for MNCs and a prominent means for foreign headquarters to create value (Kunisch et al, 2020). This is because digitalization is smoothing the process of controlling foreign subsidiaries, and foreign headquarters are focusing on the spanning of MNC activity.…”