“…Since our previous results show that board size is not an alternative monitoring mechanism for insider holdings, we omit this mechanism to reduce the number of equations and focus on insider holdings, monitoring directors and holdings, and equity-based compensation. Omitting board size is also consistent with Chhaochharia and Laeven (2009), who find board size is not a significant determinant of a firm's overall governance system. We use two methods to address this concern of interdependency.…”
“…Since our previous results show that board size is not an alternative monitoring mechanism for insider holdings, we omit this mechanism to reduce the number of equations and focus on insider holdings, monitoring directors and holdings, and equity-based compensation. Omitting board size is also consistent with Chhaochharia and Laeven (2009), who find board size is not a significant determinant of a firm's overall governance system. We use two methods to address this concern of interdependency.…”
“…Governance rules and practice differ between countries, and are dependent on the level of economic and financial development (La Porta et al, 1998Chhaochharia and Laeven, 2009). Four institutional and external governance covariates are considered, covering economic freedom, institutional development, GDP per capita, and property rights.…”
Section: Stage 2: Investigating the Determinants Of The Persistence Omentioning
“…Given that the prior literature (see e.g., Black et al 2006;Cremers and Ferrell 2010) has suggested that corporate governance structures change slowly and the implications of the governance practices can be seen with a lag, we use the Gov-Scores for year 2005 in our empirical analysis. Hence, we assume in our analysis that the strength of corporate governance can be quantified with the Gov-Score index, and moreover, that the strength of governance mechanism incorporated in 2005 is reflected in bank performance during 2005-2008. Considerable empirical evidence suggests that strong corporate governance has positive effects on the firm's financial performance, market valuation, and stock returns (see e.g., Ammann et al 2011;Bebchuk et al 2009;Bhagat and Bolton 2008;Brown andCaylor 2006, 2009;Chhaochharia and Laeven 2009;Cremers and Ferrell 2010;Gompers et al 2003;Johnson et al 2009;Renders et al 2010). Following the prior bank performance literature (e. g., Caprio et al 2007;Chiorazzo et al 2008;Ciciretti et al 2009;de Andres and Vallelado 2008;Outreville 2010;Sierra et al 2006), we employ return on assets (ROA) and Tobin's Q to measure the financial performance and market valuation of banks.…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previously, an extensive empirical literature has documented that firms with strong corporate governance mechanisms are generally associated with better financial performance, higher firm valuation and higher stock returns (see e.g., Ammann et al 2011;Bebchuk et al 2009;Bhagat and Bolton 2008;Brown andCaylor 2006, 2009;Chhaochharia and Laeven 2009;Core et al 2006;Cremers and Ferrell 2010;Cremers and Nair 2005;Gompers et al 2003;Johnson et al 2009;Renders et al 2010). The role of corporate governance in the banking industry has been examined e.g.…”
This paper focuses on the effects of corporate governance on bank performance during the financial crisis of 2008. Using data on large publicly traded U.S. banks, we examine whether banks with stronger corporate governance mechanisms were associated with higher profitability and better stock market performance amidst the crisis. Our empirical findings on the effects of corporate governance on bank performance are mixed. Although the results suggest that banks with stronger corporate governance mechanisms were associated with higher profitability in 2008, our findings also indicate that strong governance may have had negative effects on stock market valuations of banks amidst the crisis. Nevertheless, we document that banks with strong corporate governance practices had substantially higher stock returns in the aftermath of the market meltdown, indicating that good governance may have mitigated the adverse influence of the crisis on bank credibility.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.