2006
DOI: 10.1504/ijbge.2006.011160
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Corporate governance mechanisms and the performance of small-cap firms in Canada

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
35
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 98 publications
5
35
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This model has previously been used by several research works, especially for the purpose of validating the causal effect between governance and performance, among which one can cite Bhagat and Bolton (2008) along with Switzer and Kelly (2006).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This model has previously been used by several research works, especially for the purpose of validating the causal effect between governance and performance, among which one can cite Bhagat and Bolton (2008) along with Switzer and Kelly (2006).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To note, a simultaneous equations approach serves to take into account both of the endogeneity and causal effect. Switzer and Kelly (2006) apply simultaneous equations system to explain the interaction of four governance mechanisms, namely: board independence, managerial ownership as well as indebtedness level, and they found a significant impact of some governance mechanisms on performance. Given the corporate governance concept and importance of the transparency notion, verification of causal relationship is motivating.…”
Section: Corporate Governance Mechanisms and Information Transparencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The larger board of directors, the more experienced and knowledgeable people will be available which will lead to more careful learning, decision making process and ultimately better firm performance. Larger board of directors is harmful to firms' performance (Switzer & Tang, 2009). Arora (2012) examined the impact of board directors' size on the performance of 150 pharmaceutical companies for the period from 2001 to 2010, the study found that board directors' size has a positive impact on firms' performance.…”
Section: Board Of Directors' Size and Firms' Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also called outside director (Muniandy & Hillier, 2015). Many studies were conducted to investigate the association between board independence and firms' performance; Switzer & Tang (2009) investigated the impact of degree of board independence on the performance of 245 Small-Cap firms U.S for the period from 2000 to 2004; it was found that degree of board independence positively correlates with firms' performance. Citation & Chatterjee (2011) aimed to explore the relationship between board directors' independence and Indian firms, the sample covered public, private, undertaking, standalone firms, and subsidiaries foreign firms.…”
Section: Board Independence and Firms' Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, we also control for the CEO's previous stock ownership in our performance equations in accord with the finding of Jensen and Meckling (1976) that managers' incentives to work harder and boost performance increase as their ownership in the firm rises. Finally, we include leverage and growth in our performance equations in line with Mehran (1995) and Switzer and Tang (2009).…”
Section: Return Equationmentioning
confidence: 99%