2003
DOI: 10.5465/amr.2003.10196703
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Corporate Governance: Decades of Dialogue and Data

Abstract: The field oi corporate governance is at a crossroads. Our knowledge oi what we know about the eificacy oi corporate governance mechanisms is rivaled by what we do not know. This special topic ionim is dedicated to continuing the rich tradition oi research in this area, with the hope that the models and theories oiiered will propel corporate governance research to the next level, enhancing our understanding oi those governance structures and mechanisms that best serve organizational functioning. Catherine M. Da… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

14
917
1
30

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,384 publications
(1,012 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
14
917
1
30
Order By: Relevance
“…It therefore plays a key role in the overall overseeing of the company and the monitoring of top management in particular (Jensen and Meckling 1976;John and Senbet 1998;Daily et al 2003;Chatterjee et al 2003). Thus, the Board of Directors is an essential element of CG and is considered the main internal mechanism in reducing agency conflicts, either between managers and shareholders or between majority and minority shareholders (LaFond and Roychowdhury 2006;De Andrade et al 2009).…”
Section: Board Of Directorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It therefore plays a key role in the overall overseeing of the company and the monitoring of top management in particular (Jensen and Meckling 1976;John and Senbet 1998;Daily et al 2003;Chatterjee et al 2003). Thus, the Board of Directors is an essential element of CG and is considered the main internal mechanism in reducing agency conflicts, either between managers and shareholders or between majority and minority shareholders (LaFond and Roychowdhury 2006;De Andrade et al 2009).…”
Section: Board Of Directorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Democratic (one-person-one-vote) determination of the broad uses to which organizational resources (collective property) will be deployed (i.e., governance; cf. Daily, Dalton, & Cannella, 2003) are made in other co-operatives too (e.g., Tuominen et al, 2009). Here it is important that the co-operators expect their voice to be heard (i.e., they will have a say) and trust those they are interdependent with.…”
Section: Social Exchange Interest and The Expectation Of Socio-emotiomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Increasingly, boards play an active role in formulating organizational strategy and disseminating information and advice to managers (Carpenter & Westphal, 2001;Daily, Dalton, & Cannella, 2003;Judge & Zeithaml, 1992;Westphal & Zajac, 1997). Because information that enters the firm via this network is screened and filtered by board members (Salman & Saives, 2005) and subject to processes that lead to bounded rationality, it is important to consider how characteristics of these directors could impact the organizational interpretation and response to institutional pressures.…”
Section: Intra-organizational Factors: Board Experiencementioning
confidence: 99%