2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.intaccaudtax.2015.10.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Corporate governance and forward-looking disclosure: Evidence from China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
47
1
7

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
13
47
1
7
Order By: Relevance
“…This corporate governance mechanism as a function to convince foreigners will be given a profit on the capital investment provided to the company or managers assure that the funds invested will not be embezzled or will not be used on projects that are unfavorable to foreig-ners as well as how much to control managers (Shleifer & Vishny, 1997;Liu, 2015;Hodgdon & Hughes, 2016) An addition to applying corporate mechanisms, foreigners will be able to use qualified auditors to assess the reliability of the company's financial management reporting. So it will lower the fraud financial statement.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This corporate governance mechanism as a function to convince foreigners will be given a profit on the capital investment provided to the company or managers assure that the funds invested will not be embezzled or will not be used on projects that are unfavorable to foreig-ners as well as how much to control managers (Shleifer & Vishny, 1997;Liu, 2015;Hodgdon & Hughes, 2016) An addition to applying corporate mechanisms, foreigners will be able to use qualified auditors to assess the reliability of the company's financial management reporting. So it will lower the fraud financial statement.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This checklist was constructed based on the checklist of Liu 29 and modified to fit with the mandatory disclosure requirement from the Capital Market Authority in Indonesia. EDIR and effectiveness of Board of Commissioners (EBOC) was assessed with the checklist 12 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Angka p > 0,05 menunjukkan bahwa ukuran dewan komisaris tidak sig nifikan mempengaruhi atau bukan penjelas voluntary disclosure. Temuan ini tidak sesuai dengan penelitian Liu (2015), Octavia (2017), dan Kurnianto, Sutrisno, & Saraswati (2016) yang menyatakan bahwa ukuran dewan ko misaris mempengaruhi tingkat voluntary disclosure secara positif. Penelitian ini tidak berbeda dengan hasil Liang, Chen, & Chen (2016) 64 Jurnal Akuntansi Multiparadigma, Volume 9, Nomor 1, April 2018, Hlm 57-69 Tabel 3 Hasil Pengujian Regresi Linier Berganda ris tidak mempengaruhi terhadap luas voluntary disclosure.…”
Section: Hasil Dan Pembahasanunclassified
“…Nilai p < 0,05 yang berarti ukuran komite audit mempengaruhi secara sig nifikan dengan arah yang positif terhadap variabel indepen atau dapat diartikan meru pakan penjelas dari voluntary disclosure. Temuan ini tidak berbeda dengan peneli tianpenelitian lain terdahulu seperti Liu (2015) dan Brada (2016) (2015), Octavia (2017) yang memerlihatkan ada hubungan mengarah positif dan signifikan antara firm size pada voluntary disclosure. Chauhan, Lakshmi, & Dey (2016) menya takan perusahaan besar tidak akan lepas dari tekanan para stakeholdernya sehingga permintaan informasi juga meningkat.…”
Section: Hasil Dan Pembahasanunclassified