“…Variables are defined as follows: independent outside directors (PIOD), independent outside directors multiplied by corruption (PIODCORR), board size (BSIZ), board size multiplied by corruption (BSIZZCORR); CEO duality (DUAL), CEO duality multiplied by corruption (DUALCORR), female ratio (BFEM), board female multiplied by corruption (BFEMCORR), corruption used as a proxy for governance quality (Corruption), audit firm size (AUDF), firm size(FSIZ), firm profitability (FPROF), firm capital structure (FCS), firm liquidity (FLIQ), firm growth (FGROW), firm loss (FLOSS). we rely on the random effect model (e.g., Elamer et al, 2017Elamer et al, , 2018Elamer et al, , 2019aElamer et al, , 2019bElghuweel et al, 2017;Ghosh et al, 2010;Huse et al, 2011;van Ees et al, 2009;Zona et al, 2018). Based on the overall sample (Model I) for UK firms, the results support the moderating effect of GQ, showing that firms with a high proportion of independent outside directors multiplied by corruption (PIODCORR) have a negative coefficient (t = −1.80 at the 10% confidence level).…”