2020
DOI: 10.1002/ijfe.2120
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Corporate governance and earnings management nexus: Evidence from the UK and Egypt using neural networks

Abstract: Using conventional regressions and generalized regression neural networks (GRNNs), we examine the relationship between corporate governance (CG) and earnings management (EM). We also examine whether governance quality moderates the association between EM and CG for a sample of British and Egyptian companies. Our findings show that: (a) UK firms are likely to have lower levels of EM if they: have smaller boards, are dominated by independent outside directors, and have a low percentage of female directors; (b) E… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 99 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Variables are defined as follows: independent outside directors (PIOD), independent outside directors multiplied by corruption (PIODCORR), board size (BSIZ), board size multiplied by corruption (BSIZZCORR); CEO duality (DUAL), CEO duality multiplied by corruption (DUALCORR), female ratio (BFEM), board female multiplied by corruption (BFEMCORR), corruption used as a proxy for governance quality (Corruption), audit firm size (AUDF), firm size(FSIZ), firm profitability (FPROF), firm capital structure (FCS), firm liquidity (FLIQ), firm growth (FGROW), firm loss (FLOSS). we rely on the random effect model (e.g., Elamer et al, 2017Elamer et al, , 2018Elamer et al, , 2019aElamer et al, , 2019bElghuweel et al, 2017;Ghosh et al, 2010;Huse et al, 2011;van Ees et al, 2009;Zona et al, 2018). Based on the overall sample (Model I) for UK firms, the results support the moderating effect of GQ, showing that firms with a high proportion of independent outside directors multiplied by corruption (PIODCORR) have a negative coefficient (t = −1.80 at the 10% confidence level).…”
Section: Multivariate Regression Analysesmentioning
confidence: 69%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Variables are defined as follows: independent outside directors (PIOD), independent outside directors multiplied by corruption (PIODCORR), board size (BSIZ), board size multiplied by corruption (BSIZZCORR); CEO duality (DUAL), CEO duality multiplied by corruption (DUALCORR), female ratio (BFEM), board female multiplied by corruption (BFEMCORR), corruption used as a proxy for governance quality (Corruption), audit firm size (AUDF), firm size(FSIZ), firm profitability (FPROF), firm capital structure (FCS), firm liquidity (FLIQ), firm growth (FGROW), firm loss (FLOSS). we rely on the random effect model (e.g., Elamer et al, 2017Elamer et al, , 2018Elamer et al, , 2019aElamer et al, , 2019bElghuweel et al, 2017;Ghosh et al, 2010;Huse et al, 2011;van Ees et al, 2009;Zona et al, 2018). Based on the overall sample (Model I) for UK firms, the results support the moderating effect of GQ, showing that firms with a high proportion of independent outside directors multiplied by corruption (PIODCORR) have a negative coefficient (t = −1.80 at the 10% confidence level).…”
Section: Multivariate Regression Analysesmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…By contrast, linking insights from a multi-theoretical perspective may offer unique insights towards interpreting and explaining EM in different regulatory and institutional contexts, such as the UK and Egypt. Also, a multitheoretical perspective may facilitate the examination of the potential interactions among BoDs, governance quality and EM (Elamer et al, 2017(Elamer et al, , 2018(Elamer et al, , 2019a(Elamer et al, , 2019bElghuweel et al, 2017;Huse et al, 2011;van Ees et al, 2009;Zona et al, 2018). From this perspective, joint insights from agency, stewardship, resource dependence, information asymmetry, managerial signalling, organizational and stakeholder theories may help in improving the relevance of BoDs and governance quality mechanisms in explaining the varied motivations for engaging in EM.…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Over the last two decades, there have been substantial changes in government and social expectations about the goals that firms should determine (Adhikariparajul et al, 2019;Alnabsha et al, 2018;Gerged et al, 2018Gerged et al, , 2020. This influences criteria that should be employed and reported to ascertain strong and weak corporate performance (Abdou et al, 2020;Elmagrhi et al, 2018;Fontana, 2020;Haque & Ntim, 2018). Thus, social and environmental reporting (SER) has grown substantially (Bux et al, 2020;Farrukh et al, 2020;García-Rodríguez et al, 2013;García-Sánchez et al, 2020;Hoque et al, 2018;Javed et al, 2020;Kowalczyk & Kucharska, 2020;Sharma, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%