Corporate Governance 2010
DOI: 10.1002/9781118258439.ch28
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Corporate Governance and Accountability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
(34 reference statements)
1
17
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…3.3 Variables measurement 3.3.1 Corporate governance. Corporate governance is a complex in nature and works as a system of devices rather than as individual provisions (Larcker et al, 2007;Dey, 2008;Solomon, 2013). In the light of a shortage of empirical evidence linking these individual devices together, we apply PCA which synthesises corporate governance mechanisms into more homogenous factors/dimensions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…3.3 Variables measurement 3.3.1 Corporate governance. Corporate governance is a complex in nature and works as a system of devices rather than as individual provisions (Larcker et al, 2007;Dey, 2008;Solomon, 2013). In the light of a shortage of empirical evidence linking these individual devices together, we apply PCA which synthesises corporate governance mechanisms into more homogenous factors/dimensions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the cost of corporate governance depends on its quality (Solomon, 2013). For example, high-quality corporate governance systems (e.g.…”
Section: Agency Conflicts Corporate Governance Financial Performance ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…3.2.2 Corporate governance and environmental, social and governance. According to agency theory, the presence of nonexecutive directors can provide an independent voice on the board to minimize potential conflicts of interest between the principal (shareholders) and the agent (senior management) and reduce the opportunistic behavior of senior executives (Solomon, 2010). Organizations are responsible for establishing a well-structured and accountable internal control system with a transparent flow of information and business operations (Jensen, 1993).…”
Section: Disparities In Esg Reportingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, accountability is more than that. It is about having ownership over one's actions whether the consequences of those actions are good or bad (Jones, 2010). Thus, accountability does not reflect on deficiencies in organisations only, but leverages from accomplishments.…”
Section: Transparencymentioning
confidence: 99%