2013
DOI: 10.1002/isaf.1338
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Corporate Dividend Policy Determinants: Intelligent Versus a Traditional Approach

Abstract: SUMMARY Dividend is the return that an investor receives when purchasing a company's shares. The decision to pay these dividends to shareholders concerns several other groups of people, such as financial managers, consulting firms, individual and institutional investors, government and monitoring authorities, and creditors, just to name a few. The prediction and modelling of this decision has received a significant amount of attention in the corporate finance literature. However, the methods used to study the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
(57 reference statements)
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The other results show the life cycle theory can be applied where firms as dividend payers relative to firms as non dividend payers are firms in mature phase because they have higher retained earnings over their equities (DeAngelo, DeAngelo, and Stulz, 2006;Fairchild, Guney, and Thanatawee, 2014), and more profitable (Fama and French, 2001;Fama and French, 2002;DeAngelo, DeAngelo, and Stulz, 2006;Longinidis and Symeonidis, 2013). The other insignificant variables also support the results which is consistent with Grullon, Michaely, and Swaminathan (2002).…”
Section: Firms With Lower Debt Smaller Size and Profitablesupporting
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The other results show the life cycle theory can be applied where firms as dividend payers relative to firms as non dividend payers are firms in mature phase because they have higher retained earnings over their equities (DeAngelo, DeAngelo, and Stulz, 2006;Fairchild, Guney, and Thanatawee, 2014), and more profitable (Fama and French, 2001;Fama and French, 2002;DeAngelo, DeAngelo, and Stulz, 2006;Longinidis and Symeonidis, 2013). The other insignificant variables also support the results which is consistent with Grullon, Michaely, and Swaminathan (2002).…”
Section: Firms With Lower Debt Smaller Size and Profitablesupporting
confidence: 62%
“…The positive significant effect by share price shows firms as dividend payers relative to firms as non dividend payers have strong tendency to follow catering theory as proposed by Wurgler (2004a, 2004b), Li and Lie (2006), and Pontoh (2015). The results also imply in general condition, firms as dividend payers relative to firms as non dividend payers with age below 33 years are seems in mature phase for their business because they have abundant retained earnings (DeAngelo, DeAngelo, and Stulz, 2006;Fairchild, Guney, and Thanatawee, 2014), more profitable (Fama and French, 2001;Fama and French, 2002;DeAngelo, DeAngelo, and Stulz, 2006;Longinidis and Symeonidis, 2013), and larger size (Grullon, Michaely, and Swaminathan, 2002;DeAngelo, DeAngelo, and Stulz, 2006). But since debt has negative effect to dividends which is consistent with Acharya, Almeida, and Campello (2007) and Strebulaev and Yang (2013), then these firms cannot be said in mature phase at full because since the consequence of debt is interest expense then the profit for these firms are reduced make them have tendency to decrease their dividends.…”
Section: Firms With General Conditionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Profitability. Fama and Babiak (1968), Fama and French (2002), and also Longinidis and Symeonidis (2013), notifed that there is a strong relationship between profit and dividend because profitable firms pay out more of their earnings as dividends. From this point, the working of Aharony and Swary (1980) as well as of Kane, Lee, and Marcus (1984), about the information of firm's future prospects related to announcement of dividend and earnings was reviewed By these facts, earnings per share were determined as indicator for profitability measured by net income divided by shares outstanding.…”
Section: Methods Of Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The primary goal of a company's financial management is to maximize the current value per share of the existing stock. One substantial financial decision affecting this value maximization goal is the dividend policy (Longinidis & Symeonidis, 2013;Kouser, et al 2015). It has attracted scholars' attention since the 1950s while for financial economists it remains the most debated puzzle (Jabbouri, 2016;Guttman et al, 2008).…”
Section: Determinants Of Corporate Dividend Policy In Polish Companiementioning
confidence: 99%