2021
DOI: 10.1111/meca.12373
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Corporate debt, endogenous dividend rate, instability and growth

Abstract: In a neo-Kaleckian growth-model, we endogenize the dividend rate and corporate debt in the long run and investigate the possibility of multiple equilibria and instability in the economy. We find that the economy is in a wage-led demand and debt-burdened growth regime.However, both debt-led and debt-burdened demand regimes are possible. In some instances, the speed of the adjustment parameter related to the dividend dynamics plays a crucial role in stabilizing the economy.Otherwise, the economy may lose its sta… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
(104 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…BothCharles (2008) andKim and Isaac (2017) assume a positive relationship between the debt and retention ratio. However, inParui (2022), we propose that precisely the opposite happens. Second,Charles (2008) andKim and Isaac (2017) assume the debt-capital ratio as the only determinant of the retention ratio, whereasDallery and van Treeck (2011) andYilmaz and Stockhammer (2019) consider the rate of profit as the determinant of the retention ratio.…”
mentioning
confidence: 79%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…BothCharles (2008) andKim and Isaac (2017) assume a positive relationship between the debt and retention ratio. However, inParui (2022), we propose that precisely the opposite happens. Second,Charles (2008) andKim and Isaac (2017) assume the debt-capital ratio as the only determinant of the retention ratio, whereasDallery and van Treeck (2011) andYilmaz and Stockhammer (2019) consider the rate of profit as the determinant of the retention ratio.…”
mentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Second,Charles (2008) andKim and Isaac (2017) assume the debt-capital ratio as the only determinant of the retention ratio, whereasDallery and van Treeck (2011) andYilmaz and Stockhammer (2019) consider the rate of profit as the determinant of the retention ratio. Along with the debt-capital ratio, the expected future rate of profit and expected growth rate are also significant determinants of firms' targeted dividend capital ratios, both of which we include inParui (2022). On these grounds, our model(Parui, 2022) provides a more general explanation of dividend (or retention) dynamics than the existing literature.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation