2015
DOI: 10.1016/s2212-5671(15)01211-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Corporate Culture and the Occurrence of Financial Statement Fraud: A Review of Literature

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
13
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result, damaging events undertaken by individuals with distinctly different culture (e.g. conduct risk [ 62 ]) is inherently hard to predict given that the identification of such individuals must take place at an individual basis—a resource intensive and challenging task. These finding highlight some of the limitations of observational studies for theory building purposes, as (a) a trend appears to emerge and then disappear without any external intervention (where observational studies are limited in mapping the state of an organization at a given point in time—see Roe [ 8 ] and Holme and Liljeros [ 9 ]) and (b) different organizational levels exhibit distinct behaviors despite the fact that the exact same mechanism is in place (where observational studies do not explicitly distinguish between multiple levels of analysis, as noted by Kozlowski et al [ 7 ]).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, damaging events undertaken by individuals with distinctly different culture (e.g. conduct risk [ 62 ]) is inherently hard to predict given that the identification of such individuals must take place at an individual basis—a resource intensive and challenging task. These finding highlight some of the limitations of observational studies for theory building purposes, as (a) a trend appears to emerge and then disappear without any external intervention (where observational studies are limited in mapping the state of an organization at a given point in time—see Roe [ 8 ] and Holme and Liljeros [ 9 ]) and (b) different organizational levels exhibit distinct behaviors despite the fact that the exact same mechanism is in place (where observational studies do not explicitly distinguish between multiple levels of analysis, as noted by Kozlowski et al [ 7 ]).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding corporate governance rules, Malaysia struggles to catch up with other countries. A study by Omar et al (2015) produced evidence that improvement in corporate culture is essential to overcome the occurrence of financial statement fraud. For instance, Bursa Malaysia plays a big role in changing the culture as the Stock Exchange supports by organising numerous seminars and training courses to the public firms.…”
Section: Corporate Governance Performance In Malaysiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Question 2: Is there any significant difference between the scores of understanding organizational relationships and the effect of organizational goals on workers' activities by gender, education, work experience, age, marital status, insurance coverage and criminal record? The results Stated in Table (10) show that there is no significant difference between the scores of the role of understanding the organizational relationship and the effectiveness of the organization's goals on the activities of workers in terms of sex, education, work experience, age, marital status, insurance coverage and criminal record. However, it must be considered existence more and less differences in this area.…”
Section: Fig 1 Comparison Of the Average Score Of Responses Relatedmentioning
confidence: 92%