2015
DOI: 10.1080/15205436.2015.1066013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Corporate Crisis Communication: Examining the Interplay of Reputation and Crisis Response Strategies

Abstract: This experiment study used a 2 × 3 between-subjects design to assess two factors in crisis communication and reputation management-prior corporate reputation (good and bad) and crisis response strategies (apology, sympathy, and compensation)on an organization facing high crisis responsibility. Results indicate that stakeholders prefer apology to compensation response strategies. Organizations with a prior good reputation have better postcrisis reviews that those with a prior bad reputation. Crisis managers fac… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
39
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(47 reference statements)
2
39
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Reputation is an element of Intellectual capital and an essential part of a company's value (Lentjushenkova et al, 2019). On one hand, maintaining reputational stability and anti-crisis reputation management are the components of a single reputation management system (Kiambi & Shafer, 2016). Nevertheless, practices of dealing with reputational crises seem to be contrasted with regular reputational management at the same time (Malkawi et al, 2015), meanwhile, it has been argued that anti-crisis management tools can be aimed at a minute-to-minute effect and therefore contradict the long-term and strategic goals of reputation management (Mason, 2016;Szwajca, 2018a).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reputation is an element of Intellectual capital and an essential part of a company's value (Lentjushenkova et al, 2019). On one hand, maintaining reputational stability and anti-crisis reputation management are the components of a single reputation management system (Kiambi & Shafer, 2016). Nevertheless, practices of dealing with reputational crises seem to be contrasted with regular reputational management at the same time (Malkawi et al, 2015), meanwhile, it has been argued that anti-crisis management tools can be aimed at a minute-to-minute effect and therefore contradict the long-term and strategic goals of reputation management (Mason, 2016;Szwajca, 2018a).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, SCCT that develop by Coombs has been acknowledged by many researches as the guideline to choose crisis response strategy [32]- [33]- [34]- [35]. SCCT involves the relationships, variables and assumptions that need to be considered in choosing the suitable crisis response strategies to protect an organization's image and reputation [18].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It helps practitioners form a complete picture of a crisis dynamic rather than only thinking about what to say. Since its introduction, scholars have tested intensifi ers proposed by the theory, like prior reputation and crisis history (e.g., Coombs, 2004;Kiambi & Shafer, 2016). As more evidence is gained through empirical research, one variable initially proposed by SCCT draws the least attention and only reaches inconsistent fi ndings: crisis severity.…”
Section: Appendix B: Crisis Information Seeking Survey Instructions Amentioning
confidence: 99%