2017
DOI: 10.21037/jss.2017.08.06
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Corpectomy and expandable cage replacement versus third generation percutaneous augmentation system in case of vertebra plana: rationale and recommendations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several clinical studies have shown the efficacy of the expandable cage, mostly in the cervical spine [2][3][4][5][6][7]10,[15][16][17][18][19][20][21]. Most common indications were, similar to our study, cervical spinal canal stenosis [7,12], metastases [5,10,17], fractures [2,6] and spondylodiscitis [4,19].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several clinical studies have shown the efficacy of the expandable cage, mostly in the cervical spine [2][3][4][5][6][7]10,[15][16][17][18][19][20][21]. Most common indications were, similar to our study, cervical spinal canal stenosis [7,12], metastases [5,10,17], fractures [2,6] and spondylodiscitis [4,19].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Expandable cages (ECs) are frequently used to reconstruct the anterior spinal column after corpectomy. Indications include spinal canal stenosis with compression of the spinal cord [1], fracture [2,3], spondylodiscitis [4], and metastases [5]. Corpectomy of the cervical spine is performed through the anterior approach with the need of a graft or implant device for reconstruction [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was recommended to perform multilevel pedicle screw fixation but this was problematic in already osteoporotic elderly patients, where pedicle screws in adjacent osteoporotic vertebrae would loosen or not hold, as well as the elderly patients having significant medical co-morbidities that precluded a major spinal surgical procedure. Often fixation was done without correction of the collapsed vertebrae or correction of the kyphosis, which led to further fracture progression [ 2 , 3 ]. Recently, short segment pedicle fixation combined with kyphoplasty or vertebral corpectomy and vertebral replacement was suggested to improve the kyphosis [ 4 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may be because of the poor general condition and frequent instrumentation failure resulting from low bone quality in elderly patients. To treat these patients, a less invasive surgical approach in combination with more rigid fixation may be optimal [ 8 ], but some patients still require revision surgery because of progression of their kyphotic deformity, instrumentation failure, or both. Numerous comparative studies of surgical procedures have focused on clinical and radiographical outcomes, as well as the effect of bone fragility on the outcome of spinal surgery [ 9 , 10 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%