Coronial postmortem reports and indirect COVID-19 pandemic-related mortality

Abstract

AimsWidespread disruption of healthcare services and excess mortality not directly attributed to COVID-19 occurred between March and May 2020. We undertook the first UK multicentre study of coroners’ autopsies before and during this period using postmortem reports.MethodsWe reviewed reports of non-forensic coroners’ autopsies performed during the first COVID-19 lockdown (23 March to 8 May 2020), and the same period in 2018. Deaths were categorised as natural non-COVID-19, COVID-19-related, non-natural (suicide, drug and alcohol-related, traumatic, other). We provided opinion regarding whether delayed access to medical care or changes in behaviour due to lockdown were a potential factor in deaths.ResultsSeven centres covering nine coronial jurisdictions submitted a total of 1100 coroners’ autopsies (498 in 2018, 602 in 2020). In only 54 autopsies was death attributed to COVID-19 (9%). We identified a significant increase in cases where delays in accessing medical care potentially contributed to death (10 in 2018, 44 in 2020). Lockdown was a contributing factor in a proportion of suicides (24%) and drug and alcohol-related deaths (12%).ConclusionsPostmortem reports have considerable utility in evaluating excess mortality due to healthcare and wider societal disruption during a pandemic. They provide information at an individual case level that is not available from assessment of death certification data. Detailed evaluation of coroners’ autopsy reports, supported by appropriate regulatory oversight, is recommended to mitigate disruption and indirect causes of mortality in future pandemics. Maintaining access to healthcare, including substance misuse and mental health services, is an important consideration.

The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on patients’ experiences obtaining a tuberculosis diagnosis in Peru: a mixed-methods study

“…In addition, a survey of health care workers from 64 countries found that most felt that people with TB and HIV faced greater challenges accessing health services during the pandemic, with reduced mobility and health facility closures frequently stated as reasons [19]. While the pandemic's effects on TB-associated mortality have not yet become clear [20], increased deaths from cardiovascular disease [21,22], neonatal deaths [23], and deaths attributable to delays in accessing medical care during the pandemic [24] have been reported in various countries. Thus, it is an important lesson for future public health emergencies that changes to health system priorities and procedures should consider who may be harmed as well as who will benefit.…”

Analysis of the role of PMCT during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review

“…Moreover, PMCT in combination with percutaneous biopsies to avoid autopsies when the autopsy facility is not adequate for the COVID-19 biological risk [23] . The pre-autopsy application of PMCT is of great medico-legal and public health value [24] , [25] , [26] , [27] . Furthermore, it has been proved that COVID-19 cases, especially in untreated patients, can expose the autopsy room operators to a significant biological risk [24] , [25] , [26] , [27] .…”

“…The pre-autopsy application of PMCT is of great medico-legal and public health value [24] , [25] , [26] , [27] . Furthermore, it has been proved that COVID-19 cases, especially in untreated patients, can expose the autopsy room operators to a significant biological risk [24] , [25] , [26] , [27] . It should be also considered that, as a screening tool, PMCT has been reported to have a high sensitivity, even higher than that of a microbiological testing [28] .…”