Viral and Other Infections of the Human Respiratory Tract 1996
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-011-7930-0_9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coronaviruses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 158 publications
(171 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Experimental infection with a laboratory strain of virus differs in several respects to a wild infection. The ability of a cultured virus to trigger LRT symptoms may well be affected by attenuation as well as some unknown virus‐specific factors, although this did not prove to be the case here or in previous studies [18, 23]. The dose and route of inoculation are clearly different from the wild situation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Experimental infection with a laboratory strain of virus differs in several respects to a wild infection. The ability of a cultured virus to trigger LRT symptoms may well be affected by attenuation as well as some unknown virus‐specific factors, although this did not prove to be the case here or in previous studies [18, 23]. The dose and route of inoculation are clearly different from the wild situation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…HCoV, the second most prevalent common cold virus, is known to be associated with exacerbations of asthma in children [16] and with pre‐school wheeze [17]. Also, symptoms may be virus‐dependent [18], so it is important to study viruses other than HRV. We have previously reported that LRT symptoms and increased bronchial responsiveness in EVW subjects occur only during symptomatic infection and that these effects are independent of atopy [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the next four decades little attention was paid to this human virus family, although it was recognised that the total range of pathogenicity within the wider family was very wide, encompassing gastroenteritis in pigs, bronchitis in chickens and liver disease in mice. There were some warnings of viral pneumonia in humans, but only in army camps and other rather closed communities 8 . Most adults in the world have antibody and presumably immunity to the two classic virus serotypes and there is little evidence of antigenic drift or changes over the years.…”
Section: The Family Coronaviridaementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Serologically, human antibodies to the two human viruses 229E and OC43 do not cross react with the new virus. The rapidity of modern molecular techniques has lead to the development of new diagnostic tests for the virus using reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT‐PCR) and also serological tests within 6 weeks of the first isolation of virus 8 . To date the latter have failed to detect antiviral antibody in non‐ill controls, whereas clinically ill patients, as expected, show rises in specific antibody to the new coronavirus but not to the two known, more mild, human coronaviruses.…”
Section: The New Human Urbani Sars Coronavirusmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation