2022
DOI: 10.1007/s00134-022-06869-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coronavirus disease 2019 subphenotypes and differential treatment response to convalescent plasma in critically ill adults: secondary analyses of a randomized clinical trial

Abstract: Purpose Benefit from convalescent plasma therapy for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been inconsistent in randomized clinical trials (RCTs) involving critically ill patients. As COVID-19 patients are immunologically heterogeneous, we hypothesized that immunologically similar COVID-19 subphenotypes may differ in their treatment responses to convalescent plasma and explain inconsistent findings between RCTs . Methods We tested this hypothesis in a substudy involvi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Comparing ICU discharge with ICU admission timepoint, CXCL10 was lower at discharge (Figure-1d). Correlations between cytokines were positive, and signi cant, at all-time points (Figure-1e), consistent with our previous report5 . On admission day there were two notable negative correlations.…”
supporting
confidence: 92%
“…Comparing ICU discharge with ICU admission timepoint, CXCL10 was lower at discharge (Figure-1d). Correlations between cytokines were positive, and signi cant, at all-time points (Figure-1e), consistent with our previous report5 . On admission day there were two notable negative correlations.…”
supporting
confidence: 92%
“…in a secondary analysis of convalescent plasma in the REMAP-CAP trial, 20 the same biomarkers measured in the LOVIT trial 7 were comparable between the vitamin C and placebo groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The results from the current study, which included both a critically ill population with mainly COVID-19 respiratory failure and a population that was not critically ill, are consistent with the LOVIT trial that included patients with sepsis who were treated with vasopressors. Existing analyses do not elucidate the mechanisms of harm, and while future biomarker analyses from the LOVIT-COVID trial may be informative, as shown in a secondary analysis of convalescent plasma in the REMAP-CAP trial, the same biomarkers measured in the LOVIT trial were comparable between the vitamin C and placebo groups. A meta-analysis of 9 trials (the largest included trial randomized 100 patients) found a reduced odds of mortality in patients with COVID-19 receiving vitamin C. These divergent results may be explained by the more extreme effects observed in the small trials …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…These findings are in line with previous results, indicating that the benefits of corticosteroids are greater for patients on IMV than patients on oxygen only 2 . Critically ill COVID-19 patients requiring IMV have greater systemic and pulmonary inflammation, alongside dysregulated immune responses 29 , with distinct COVID-19 immune response subpopulations (i.e., subphenotypes) 30 32 . Corticosteroids have genomic, and non-genomic effects that are dose dependent 33 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%