2018
DOI: 10.1111/eci.13030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coronary stent implantation and adverse cardiac events after surgery

Abstract: Background In the risk assessment of patients considered for non‐cardiac surgery and with recent coronary stent implantation, coronary drug‐eluting stent implantation procedure characteristics may be taken into account. We aimed to evaluate associations between coronary drug‐eluting stent implantation procedure characteristics and the risk of myocardial infarction and all‐cause death within 30 days after non‐cardiac surgery. Design Patients with coronary drug‐eluting stents were identified using the Western De… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(54 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the overall cohort, we previously found no association between the number of implanted stents and the risk of MI or all-cause death within 30 days after surgery. 17 The Danish registries used in this study include large cohorts across all social classes and both genders and provide validated outcome measures with very limited loss to follow-up. [8][9][10][11][12]18 However, being a database study it lacks clinical detail, and we have no information on peri-operative management of DAPT, which may impact the outcomes assessed in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the overall cohort, we previously found no association between the number of implanted stents and the risk of MI or all-cause death within 30 days after surgery. 17 The Danish registries used in this study include large cohorts across all social classes and both genders and provide validated outcome measures with very limited loss to follow-up. [8][9][10][11][12]18 However, being a database study it lacks clinical detail, and we have no information on peri-operative management of DAPT, which may impact the outcomes assessed in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Barash et al indicated that early NCS within 3 months of DES implantation may be associated with adverse clinical outcomes[34]. Delaying elective NCS by at least 3 months after DES implantation seems safe and feasible with no significant postoperative adverse cardiac events[35]. By establishing a logistic regression formula linking the variable "Time of surgery" to MACEs, based on the Youden index, the study calculates the time point corresponding to the threshold probability as the 87th day.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Six studies analysed the incidence of MACEs in relation to the time from PCI to NCS, and compared first and newer generation DESs (Table 1). 9,[22][23][24][25][26] Only one study included patients with third and fourth generation DESs. 22 No study demonstrated a significantly increased risk of MACEs once three months had elapsed between stent implantation and NCS.…”
Section: Perioperative Maces Following Deployment Of Second Generation Dessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…24 Thim and colleagues subsequently performed another retrospective analysis on data from the Danish National Patient Registry and reported that first generation DESs were associated with a statistically significant reduction (adjusted OR 0.66) in all-cause death (but not MI) compared with second generation DESs. 26 The final relevant study was a retrospective cohort by Lo et al, in which 81.4% of patients had second generation DESs. 23 The incidence of MACEs was highest (9.1%) when surgery was performed within 45 days of stent implantation but this did not reach statistical significance.…”
Section: Perioperative Maces Following Deployment Of Second Generation Dessmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation