Coronary Sclerosis, Myocardial Infarction, Myocarditis, Cardiomyopathy, Coronary Anomalies, and the Cardiac Conduction System

Dettmeyer, R.

doi:10.1007/978-3-319-77997-3_13

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 330 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Even though there are numerous articles (often case reports) identifying as an underlying cause of death, the overall risk increase for sudden death generated by this pathology is disputed (11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20). It was associated with various potentially lethal cardiovascular pathologies, including ventricular rupture (128), life-threatening arrhythmias (129,130), acute myocardial infarction (AMI) (131,132), hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (15,20,(132)(133)(134), or apical ballooning syndrome (135,136).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Myocardial Bridging: A Meta‐Analysis of Prevalence

Hostiuc

Negoi

Rusu

et al. 2017

Journal of Forensic Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The main objective of this article was to analyze prevalence data about myocardial bridging (MB) in published studies. To this purpose, we performed a meta-analysis of studies published in English literature that contained data about the prevalence of MB and its anatomical characteristics. The overall prevalence was 19% (CI: 17-21%); autopsy studies revealed an overall prevalence of 42% (CI: 30-55%), CT studies 22% (CI: 18-25%), and coronary angiography 6% (CI: 5-8%). Most bridges were located on the left anterior descending artery (82% overall, 63% on autopsy studies), had a mean thickness of 2.47 mm and a mean length of 19.3 mm. In conclusion, autopsy studies should be the gold standard in evaluating the actual prevalence of myocardial bridges, while in vivo high-resolution CT scanning should be preferred to coronary angiography studies.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Myocardial Bridging: A Meta‐Analysis of Prevalence

Hostiuc

Negoi

Rusu

et al. 2017

Journal of Forensic Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Diagnosis of myocardial infarction at autopsy: AECVP reappraisal in the light of the current clinical classification

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Ischemic heart disease is one of the leading causes of morbidity and death worldwide. Consequently, myocardial infarctions are often encountered in clinical and forensic autopsies, and diagnosis can be challenging, especially in the absence of an acute coronary occlusion. Precise histopathological identification and timing of myocardial infarction in humans often remains uncertain while it can be of crucial importance, especially in a forensic setting when third person involvement or medical responsibilities are in question. A proper post-mortem diagnosis requires not only up-to-date knowledge of the ischemic coronary and myocardial pathology, but also a correct interpretation of such findings in relation to the clinical scenario of the deceased. For these reasons, it is important for pathologists to be familiar with the different clinically defined types of myocardial infarction and to discriminate myocardial infarction from other forms of myocardial injury. This article reviews present knowledge and postmortem diagnostic methods, including post-mortem imaging, to reveal the different types of myocardial injury and the clinicalpathological correlations with currently defined types of myocardial infarction.

show abstract

Coronary Sclerosis, Myocardial Infarction, Myocarditis, Cardiomyopathy, Coronary Anomalies, and the Cardiac Conduction System

Cited by 2 publications

References 330 publications

Myocardial Bridging: A Meta‐Analysis of Prevalence

Myocardial Bridging: A Meta‐Analysis of Prevalence

Diagnosis of myocardial infarction at autopsy: AECVP reappraisal in the light of the current clinical classification

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About