Coronary Physiology in the Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory

Abstract

Coronary angiography has been the principle modality for assessing the severity of atherosclerotic coronary artery disease for several decades. However, there is a complex relationship between angiographic coronary stenosis and the presence or absence of myocardial ischemia. Recent technological advances now allow for the assessment of coronary physiology in the catheterization laboratory at the time of diagnostic coronary angiography. Early studies focused on coronary flow reserve (CFR) but more recent work has demonstrated the physiologic accuracy and prognostic value of the fractional flow reserve (FFR) and instantaneous wave free ratio (iFR) for the assessment of coronary artery disease. These measurements have been validated in large multi-center clinical trials and have become indispensable tools for guiding revascularization in the cardiac catheterization laboratory. The physiological assessment of chest pain in the absence of epicardial coronary artery disease involves coronary thermodilution to obtain the index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR) or Doppler velocity measurement to determine the coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR). Physiology-based coronary artery assessment brings “personalized medicine” to the catheterization laboratory and allows cardiologists and referring providers to make decisions based on objective findings and evidence-based treatment algorithms. The purpose of this review is to describe the theory, technical aspects, and relevant clinical trials related to coronary physiology assessment for an intended audience of general medical practitioners.

Hemodynamics of proximal coronary lesions in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation: Patient-specific in silico study

“…A normal CFR is considered to be greater than 2.0 and in most patients should be somewhere between 3 and 5. However, there is a range of normal CFR values between approximately 2.5 and 6, so a value of 3.0 could be normal in one patient and abnormal in another 19 .…”

Pathobiology of cardiovascular diseases: an update

“…Because of its importance in clinical decision making, documentation of the severity of coronary atherosclerosis has been a major focus of clinical research and cardiology practice for many years. Stenosis severity has traditionally been assessed by direct angiographic visualization or functionally through measurements of fractional flow reserve (FFR) [86]. For both clinical and research purposes, histopathological assessment is important for correlation with angiographic and other assessments of the nature and extent of coronary artery disease.…”