1996
DOI: 10.1016/s0735-1097(96)00386-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coronary Flow Reserve During Coronary Angioplasty in Patients With a Recent Myocardial Infarction: Relation to Stenosis and Myocardial Viability

Abstract: In patients with a recent MI, CFVR was significantly lower than in those without MI, both before and after PTCA. Besides the presence of this postreperfusion-related impairment of the coronary vasodilating response, CFVR was mainly influenced by stenosis severity and not by residual viability.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
(50 reference statements)
0
24
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…8,10,11 Coronary flow reserve and fractional flow reserve after acute myocardial infarction have both been found to be predictive of myocardial recovery, albeit with variable accuracy. [31][32][33][34] However, supportive evidence correlating fractional flow reserve with viability is limited in the acute setting, when microvascular derangement is at its peak, potentially affecting the accuracy of fractional flow reserve in this context. The dependence of coronary flow reserve on prevailing hemodynamic conditions and epicardial coronary disease has also limited its applicability.…”
Section: Phasic Wia Versus Means-per-beat Assessment Of Microvascularmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8,10,11 Coronary flow reserve and fractional flow reserve after acute myocardial infarction have both been found to be predictive of myocardial recovery, albeit with variable accuracy. [31][32][33][34] However, supportive evidence correlating fractional flow reserve with viability is limited in the acute setting, when microvascular derangement is at its peak, potentially affecting the accuracy of fractional flow reserve in this context. The dependence of coronary flow reserve on prevailing hemodynamic conditions and epicardial coronary disease has also limited its applicability.…”
Section: Phasic Wia Versus Means-per-beat Assessment Of Microvascularmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, CFR measurements are subject to a high interpatient variability that is related to a variety of physiological 23,24 and pathophysiological conditions. [25][26][27] The absolute CFR Յ2.5 as a definition of impaired CFR after PTCA is based on data obtained in a selected patient population. A CFR Ͼ2.5 after successful PTCA is in accordance with a rCFR Ͼ0.80 (Figure 1).…”
Section: Relative Cfrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 Doppler guidewires have been used extensively in the AMI setting. [5][6][7][8][9][10][11] Specific coronary flow velocity patterns 7,11 and a severe impairment of coronary flow velocity reserve (CVR) 10 have been documented in patients with AMI with no reflow after primary angioplasty.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%