1979
DOI: 10.1016/0002-9149(79)90263-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coronary calcification in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
53
0
5

Year Published

1983
1983
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 161 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
53
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The median volume of coronary calcification in the initial EBT scan was 155 mm 3 (range, 14 to 1849 mm 3 ). The median volume score in the second EBT scan, after an average interval of 421 days without lipid-lowering treatment, was 201 mm 3 (range, 19 to 2486 mm 3 ), and the median volume score in the third EBT scan, after an average interval of 370 days on treatment with cerivastatin, was 203 mm 3 , with a range from 15 to 2569 mm 3 . The median annualized absolute increase in calcified volume was 25 mm 3 (range, Ϫ79 to 506) without treatment compared with 11 mm 3 (range, Ϫ462 to 247) during treatment (Pϭ0.01).…”
Section: Coronary Calcificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The median volume of coronary calcification in the initial EBT scan was 155 mm 3 (range, 14 to 1849 mm 3 ). The median volume score in the second EBT scan, after an average interval of 421 days without lipid-lowering treatment, was 201 mm 3 (range, 19 to 2486 mm 3 ), and the median volume score in the third EBT scan, after an average interval of 370 days on treatment with cerivastatin, was 203 mm 3 , with a range from 15 to 2569 mm 3 . The median annualized absolute increase in calcified volume was 25 mm 3 (range, Ϫ79 to 506) without treatment compared with 11 mm 3 (range, Ϫ462 to 247) during treatment (Pϭ0.01).…”
Section: Coronary Calcificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three measures of coronary calcium were used in the study. Primary measure was a volume score, which was determined after isotropic interpolation to minimize partial volume effects 16,17 and yields the calcified volume within the coronary arteries in mm 3 ; secondary measures were the Agatston score, the calculation of which is based on the area and peak density of the calcified lesions, 7 and a mass score, which was obtained by multiplying the calcified volume by the volumetrically averaged CT density of the calcified lesions.…”
Section: Electron Beam Tomographymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[5][6][7][8] The American Heart Association recently reviewed the data validating electron beam computed tomography (EBCT) and its ability to detect and quantify coronary calcification noninvasively. 9 A direct relationship has been established between coronary artery calcium as measured by EBCT and both histologic 10,11 and in vivo intravascular ultrasound 12,13 measures of atherosclerotic plaque on a heart-by-heart, vessel-by-vessel, and segment-by-segment basis.…”
Section: Mayo Clin Proc 1999;74:243-252mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Coronary artery calcification (CAC) is the accumulation of calcification in atherosclerotic plaques, and is an indicator of coronary atherosclerosis [3][4][5][6][7]. It is also a subclinical predictor of future coronary events [8,9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%