1998
DOI: 10.1001/archinte.158.4.333
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coronary Artery Disease in Women

Abstract: Knowledge about the natural history of coronary heart disease in women was limited until recent years. Few studies included women, despite the fact that heart disease is the No. 1 cause of death in women older than 50 years and the cause of about 500,000 deaths annually. Over the past decade, knowledge has increased owing to a combination of greater participation of women in medical studies, improved medical technology, and political pressure. While much remains to be learned, researchers have found that coron… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This transformed variable (lnApoE) was used in this study to accommodate statistical tests that assume normality. We carried out separate analyses of females and males because of the well-documented gender-specific differences in the natural history of the risk of developing cardiovascular disease (Barrett-Connor, 1997;Hayward et al 2000;Matthews et al 1989;Thomas & Braus, 1998;Xhignesse et al 1991). To document such gender specificity in our study, we used Fisher's F-ratio to test whether there was a statistically significant difference in the phenotypic variance of age, height, weight, BMI or lnApoE between females and males (Sokal & Rohlf, 1995).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This transformed variable (lnApoE) was used in this study to accommodate statistical tests that assume normality. We carried out separate analyses of females and males because of the well-documented gender-specific differences in the natural history of the risk of developing cardiovascular disease (Barrett-Connor, 1997;Hayward et al 2000;Matthews et al 1989;Thomas & Braus, 1998;Xhignesse et al 1991). To document such gender specificity in our study, we used Fisher's F-ratio to test whether there was a statistically significant difference in the phenotypic variance of age, height, weight, BMI or lnApoE between females and males (Sokal & Rohlf, 1995).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although IHD-related death rates for men and women are comparable, there are significant gender differences in the presentation and prognoses of IHD. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10] Compared with men, women are more likely to present with angina and less likely to present with recognized or unrecognized myocardial infarction. 1 Women with IHD have lower pain thresholds and report more frequent chest pain during daily life than men, 6 but among patients presenting with angina, women are less at risk than men for myocardial infarction and overall mortality.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the aging of the population, the overall number of cardiac deaths has recently increased, and the trend is expected to continue, especially in women because their life expectancy is longer than that of men [60,61]. The diagnosis of CAD in women is challenging because of the differences in clinical presentation as well as the diminished accuracy of some noninvasive diagnostic techniques and the lower prevalence of the disease [62,63].…”
Section: Womenmentioning
confidence: 99%