1996
DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.94.5.1175
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coronary Artery Calcification: Pathophysiology, Epidemiology, Imaging Methods, and Clinical Implications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

8
523
2
43

Year Published

1998
1998
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 983 publications
(582 citation statements)
references
References 127 publications
8
523
2
43
Order By: Relevance
“…5). The median values were lower in absolute value but also very consistent for different reconstruction increments (Median: AgN 110-115, Vol 112-115 mm 3 , Mass 36-38 mg). For the interpolated volume and interpolated mass, however, mean and median value are higher for low image increment.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 67%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…5). The median values were lower in absolute value but also very consistent for different reconstruction increments (Median: AgN 110-115, Vol 112-115 mm 3 , Mass 36-38 mg). For the interpolated volume and interpolated mass, however, mean and median value are higher for low image increment.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…For the interpolated volume and interpolated mass, however, mean and median value are higher for low image increment. They increase from Mean(Vol I )=261 mm 3 , Median(Vol I )=100 mm 3 , Mean(Mass I )=49 mg, and Median(Mass I )=21 mg for 3-mm image increment to Mean(Vol I )=302 mm 3 , Median(Vol I )=171 mm 3 , Mean(Mass I )=62 mg, and Median(Mass I )=40 mg for 1-mm increment (p<0.001). Agatston-, conventional volume, and conventional mass do not show systematic differences depending on the image increment, interpolated volume, and interpolated mass; however, they systematically provide lower values for small image overlap.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Although researchers are testing different presently available in vivo imaging methods for prediction of angiographically detectable stenosis [2], the tools used in diagnostic procedure of acute coronary syndrome remain the patient's history of chest pain, the specific ECG changes and the elevation of heart enzymes, for example the myoglobin and the troponins [3,4]. The golden standard for the evaluation of the extent of coronary atherosclerosis and the severity of the stenotic lesion is the coronary angiography, which shows the culprit lesion that causes the acute coronary syndrome.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%