2011
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637x/730/2/122
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coronal Seismology Using Eit Waves: Estimation of the Coronal Magnetic Field Strength in the Quiet Sun

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
42
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
6
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is in good agreement with the solar mean magnetic field (Chaplin et al, 2003). Using Hinode/EIS to measure coronal densities, West et al (2011) have found lower values of cor ≈ 0.7 G. This probably reflects the conditions of the deep activity minimum between the solar cycles 23 and 24. Using high-resolution TRACE EUV data, Ballai (2007) have derived the spatial distribution of cor (right panel in Figure 49).…”
Section: Global Coronal Seismologysupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is in good agreement with the solar mean magnetic field (Chaplin et al, 2003). Using Hinode/EIS to measure coronal densities, West et al (2011) have found lower values of cor ≈ 0.7 G. This probably reflects the conditions of the deep activity minimum between the solar cycles 23 and 24. Using high-resolution TRACE EUV data, Ballai (2007) have derived the spatial distribution of cor (right panel in Figure 49).…”
Section: Global Coronal Seismologysupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Using high-resolution TRACE EUV data, Ballai (2007) have derived the spatial distribution of cor (right panel in Figure 49). They found field strengths ranging from 0.5 to 5.6 G, thus basically covering the whole range given by Warmuth and Mann (2005a) and West et al (2011). Recently, Long et al (2013) have used data from SDO/AIA and Hinode/EIS to derive cor = 2 -6 G in the low corona, while Kwon et al (2013b,a) found cor = 0.4 -2.5 G at larger heights of 1 -3 S using white-light signatures of coronal waves.…”
Section: Global Coronal Seismologymentioning
confidence: 71%
“…The difference in the asymptotic speeds of the "reflected" waves, slice "A" (380 versus 280 km s −1 ), of the meridional track toward the north, slice "B" (260 km s −1 ), and of the SW track (280 km s −1 ), which crossed the CH, seem to reflect the variations of the local fast-mode speed in the corona and are in agreement with global MHD models (e.g., Schmidt & Ofman 2010;Zhao et al 2011). Furthermore, these differences may provide good diagnostics for coronal seismology (e.g., Yang & Chen 2010;West et al 2011), but this topic is outside of Notes. Initial refers to the initial velocity; for slice A this refers to the velocity of the wave upon being launched by the cascading loops, and for slice B and slice C refers to the velocity of the primary wave soon after the flare onset.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…West et al (2011)) used EIS density sensitive lines to get the coronal density over the QS where the 13 February 2009 wave propagated. From the propagation speed of the wave, the inferred density, and under the assumption that the observed disturbance was a fast-mode wave they obtained 0.7 ± 0.7 G for the magnetic field.…”
Section: Spectroscopic Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%