1984
DOI: 10.1029/ja089ia05p02639
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coronal mass ejections observed during the Solar Maximum Mission: Latitude distribution and rate of occurrence

Abstract: Sixty‐five coronal mass ejections have been identified in a systematic examination of white‐light coronal images obtained between March and September 1980 by the coronagraph/polarimeter flown on the solar maximum mission spacecraft. These ejections were more uniformly distributed in position angle (or “projected” solar latitude) than the similar events observed during the Skylab mission in 1973–1974; 27% of the solar maximum mission mass ejections were centered at positions more than 45° from the solar equator… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
104
1

Year Published

1985
1985
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 177 publications
(112 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(10 reference statements)
5
104
1
Order By: Relevance
“…They originate from gigantic magnetized plasma clouds, coronal mass ejections (CMEs 1 ), which are launched from the Sun at a quasi-regular basis. These eruptions were first revealed with space-based optical coronagraphs in the 1970s (Tousey 1973;Hildner 1977) and defined as distinct white-light features propagating through the coronagraph's field-of-view in time-scales from a few minutes to hours (e.g., Munro et al 1979;Hundhausen et al 1984). A schematic of an ICME showing also the leading fast forward shock (arc), and the sheath region.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They originate from gigantic magnetized plasma clouds, coronal mass ejections (CMEs 1 ), which are launched from the Sun at a quasi-regular basis. These eruptions were first revealed with space-based optical coronagraphs in the 1970s (Tousey 1973;Hildner 1977) and defined as distinct white-light features propagating through the coronagraph's field-of-view in time-scales from a few minutes to hours (e.g., Munro et al 1979;Hundhausen et al 1984). A schematic of an ICME showing also the leading fast forward shock (arc), and the sheath region.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CMEs may be related either to the flare explosions or eruptive prominences and, surprisingly, their frequency did not change by more than 20% as compared with the Skylab (1973-74) period , Hundhausen et al 1984. This seems to be related to a similar phenomenon in eruptive prominences, and its explanation is still controversial.…”
Section: Solar Maximum Mission Results (Me Machado)mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Closely associated with the disparition-brusque phenomenon are the fascinating changes that occur in the coronal structure called coronal mass ejection (CME). From an observational point of view a coronal mass ejection may be defined as a change in the coronal structure that occurs on times scales up to several hours and involves the appearance of new bright features seen in the K-corona (Munro et al, 1979;Hundhausen et al, 1984). To the extent that the "new bright features" may be due to erupting prominence material, a study of coronal mass ejections forms part of prominence research, particularly as it applies to the disparition-brusque phenomenon.…”
Section: The Disparition-brusque Phenomenonmentioning
confidence: 99%