1998
DOI: 10.1086/306435
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coronal Heating in Active Regions as a Function of Global Magnetic Variables

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

34
194
2

Year Published

2001
2001
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 150 publications
(230 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
34
194
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The pressure distribution, which is higher in the core and lower in the halo, is also in agreement with the Ðnding that pressure in active regions is correlated with higher magnetic Ñux concentrations (Golub et al 1980). The high core and cooler halo temperatures also show a correlation with the conÐn-ing magnetic Ðeld strength and conÐguration, a point that was previously discussed by Falconer et al (1997) and Fisher et al (1998).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The pressure distribution, which is higher in the core and lower in the halo, is also in agreement with the Ðnding that pressure in active regions is correlated with higher magnetic Ñux concentrations (Golub et al 1980). The high core and cooler halo temperatures also show a correlation with the conÐn-ing magnetic Ðeld strength and conÐguration, a point that was previously discussed by Falconer et al (1997) and Fisher et al (1998).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…correlates with magnetic Ðelds in active regions, while Fisher et al (1998) found a strong correlation between the magnetic Ñux and soft X-ray intensity, implying that the magnetic Ðeld is a primary quantity as regards heating. Recent results have also shown that simple scaling laws may not be universally applicable, not holding for some loop classes such as cool transition region loops (Oluseyi et al 1999a(Oluseyi et al , 1999b or Ñaring loops (Garcia 1998), while and Aschwanden, Nightengale, & Alexander (2000a) have also highlighted inconsistencies associated with scaling law relationships.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Böhm-Vitense 1992). The coronal X-ray radiative flux density is proportional to the average surface magnetic flux density (Fisher et al 1998). Hence, the L X /L bol ratio is a lower limit of the ratio between the surface magnetic flux and the outer convective flux.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, the relationship between the coronal radiative flux density and the average surface magnetic flux density is nearly linear for solar active regions and for entire stars (e.g. Fisher et al 1998;Schrijver & Zwaan 2000) over 12 orders of magnitude in absolute magnetic flux (Pevtsov et al 2003). The X-ray emission from late-type stars in open clusters exhibits two kinds of dependences on stellar rotation (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To make sure that the approximately linear relationship between SXR flux and magnetic field is not due to a natural proportionality of the extensive quantities with the magnetic area considered, which may dominate over the relatively smaller variations of the intensive quantities, the intrinsic physical relations between intensive quantities (Δ and¯), i.e., flux densities should be analysed. In the study by Fisher et al (1998) SXT DN was transformed into flux values by assuming a fixed of 3 MK, therefore the dependence of the instrumental response function was not taken into account. This may not have been important for that study, however, as the analysed ARs were approximately in the same evolutionary stage, i.e., their was probably similar.…”
Section: Evolution Of Multi-wavelength Emitted Fluxesmentioning
confidence: 99%