Techniques and Instrumentation for Detection of Exoplanets II 2005
DOI: 10.1117/12.618063
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coronagraph mask tolerances for exo-Earth detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Coronagraph mask errors include phase and amplitude transmission errors measured in the laboratory 16 , and theoretical models based on detailed electromagnetic calculations of mask 17 . We have also modeled the expected distribution of micrometeoroid damage to the primary mirror.…”
Section: Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Coronagraph mask errors include phase and amplitude transmission errors measured in the laboratory 16 , and theoretical models based on detailed electromagnetic calculations of mask 17 . We have also modeled the expected distribution of micrometeoroid damage to the primary mirror.…”
Section: Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The placement of the masks near the image plane will need to be precise to millimeter scale, so one of the primary challenges in building this system is likely to be optomechanical-ensuring that both masks remain in planes parallel to the image plane without hitting each other or becoming defocused. The finite thickness of the masks is not likely to be a consideration, however, as existing freestanding image-plane masks can be submil-limeter in thickness (e.g., 400 μm for the "bowtie" masks used on the high-contrast testbed at Princeton [Belikov et al 2007]) as can coatings on coronagraph masks placed on glass (e.g., 200 μm for eighth-order band-limited masks [Lay et al 2005]).…”
Section: Manufacturing Considerations For the Aplcmentioning
confidence: 99%