Corona was scary, lockdown was worse: A mixed-methods study of community perceptions on COVID-19 from urban informal settlements of Mumbai

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has magnified the multiple vulnerabilities of people living in urban informal settlements globally. To bring community voices from such settlements to the center of COVID-19 response strategies, we undertook a study in the urban informal settlements of Dharavi, Mumbai, from September 2020-April 2021. In this study, we have examined the awareness, attitudes, reported practices, and some broader experiences of the community in Dharavi with respect to COVID-19. We have used a mixed-methods approach, that included a cross-sectional survey of 468 people, and in-depth interviews and focus group discussions with 49 people living in this area. Data was collected via a mix of phone and face-to-face interviews. We have presented here the descriptive statistics from the survey and the key themes that emerged from our qualitative data. People reported high levels of knowledge about COVID-19, with television (90%), family and friends (56%), and social media (47%) being the main sources of information. The knowledge people had, however, was not free of misconceptions and fear; people were scared of being forcefully quarantined and dying alone during the early days of COVID-19. These fears had negative repercussions in the form of patient-related stigma and hesitancy in seeking healthcare. A year into the pandemic, however, people reported a shift in attitudes from ‘extreme fear to low fear’ (67% reported perceiving low/no COVID risk in October 2020), contributing to a general laxity in following COVID-appropriate behaviors. Currently, the community is immensely concerned about the revival of livelihoods, that have been adversely impacted due to the lockdown in 2020 as well as the continued ‘othering’ of Dharavi for being a COVID hotspot. These findings suggest that urban informal settlements like Dharavi need community-level messaging that counters misinformation and denial of the outbreak; local reinforcement of COVID-appropriate behaviours; and long-term social protection measures.

Impact on Public Health Nutrition Services Due to COVID-19 Pandemic in India: A Scoping Review of Primary Studies on Health and Social Security Determinants Affecting the First 1000 Days of Life

“…In a study in Dharavi, Mumbai ( n = 450 families), 84.8% households purchased grains from government-subsidized stores under PDS, 58.8% received them for free, 44% received cooked food/rations from ICDS or their employers, and 34% received food from NGOs [ 38 ]. In U.P.…”

Investigating the conditions of vulnerability experienced by migrant workers during the COVID‐19 pandemic in Kerala, India

“…The academic literature on their experiences is also growing (Breman, 2020;Jha, 2020, 2021;Srivastava, 2020a;Hans, Kannabiran, and Mohanty, 2021;Jesline et al, 2021;Raju, Dutta, and Ayeb-Karlsson, 2021;Mathews, De Neve, and Ayeb-Karlsson, 2023). Here we provide empirical evidence of the experiences of non-Keralite migrant workers in Kerala, India, during the first lockdown period of the This adds to a mounting evidence base on these issues across an array of state and regional contexts in India (Carswell, De Neve, and Yuvaraj, 2020;Carswell, De Neve, and Subramanyam, 2022;Ramani et al, 2022).…”

Role of civil society in health care: Mechanisms for realizing universal health coverage in vulnerable communities of India

“…There is also a high level of trust that exists between SNEHA staff and the community. A study examining community perceptions of COVID-19 from informal settlements in Mumbai found that over 90% of community members trusted information they received from health systems and NGO staff during the pandemic (21). As part of a clusterrandomized control trial, paid women health facilitators were engaged by SNEHA to trigger health behavior change related to maternal and newborn health wherein their role was to create strong community groups and encourage discussion on health issues (22).…”