Across the solar system, planetary surfaces and specifically their volcano-tectonic structures offer windows into the dynamic evolution of planetary interiors. Volcanism and tectonism rejuvenate the planetary surface depending on the rate and style of magmatic and tectonic processes. While the present Earth's surface is, at the large scale, dominated by ocean-plate tectonics (Crameri et al., 2019), other bodies' surfaces are either dominated by extensive volcanism (e.g., Io) or show very little to no sign of recent activity. The latter is the case for the classical stagnant-lid bodies, Mars, Mercury, and the Moon, which feature a strong immobile lithosphere; the global-scale convection is or was (if convection ceased at some point) restricted to the Abstract Venus is currently characterized by stagnant-lid mantle convection, but could have previously experienced episodes of global resurfacing due to lithospheric overturn. Using numerical models of Venus's interior, we attempt to explain Venus's surface characteristics in the context of interior evolution and to understand how Venus's tectonic history has diverged from Earth's. For both the stagnant-and the episodic-lid regime, we explore the role of reference mantle viscosity; for the latter regime, we also explore the role of the lithospheric yield stress. Our stagnant-lid models predict thicker crust and younger surface than typically inferred from cratering statistics. When considering resurfacing episodes, the yield stress influences the frequency of overturns, which limits crustal thickness to better agree with previous independent estimates. Surface age is variable and depends on overturn frequency and resurfacing rate between overturns but reaches larger values just before an upcoming overturn event compared to values in the stagnant-lid cases. Both regimes predict substantial lateral variations in surface age, instead of an end-member uniform surface age indicating the cessation time of the last overturn, because ongoing volcanic resurfacing is spatially heterogeneous and dominates over tectonic resurfacing. Reviewing the crater-based surface age variations suggests that the model-predicted age spreads in the episodic scenario could be consistent with Venus's cratering record. Moreover, we find that a small fraction of crust can resist recycling during overturns. These outcomes indicate that overturn events may allow for surface age variations that reproduce Venus's surface better than stagnant-lid models. Plain Language Summary In contrast to Earth, Venus currently does not feature plate tectonics inhibiting effective crustal recycling into the planetary interior. Yet, its surface features only few and almost randomly distributed craters, which suggests a globally young and more homogeneous surface age than on other planetary surfaces. To date, it remains unclear whether these surface characteristics are generated in an equilibrium style of resurfacing due to volcanism or whether largescale tectonic overturns are required to explain the observations. Her...