2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.clae.2017.04.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Corneo-scleral limbal changes following short-term soft contact lens wear

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
36
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
4
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The increase in limbal radius reverted to baseline values three hours after contact lens removal for 42% participants when wearing miniscleral contact lenses, compared to 68% in soft contact lens wearers [18]. This result is in accordance with the previously reported observation that larger limbal radius increases correspond with a longer recovery period [18].…”
Section: Minimum Absolute Change (μM) (Between Mb and M5)supporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The increase in limbal radius reverted to baseline values three hours after contact lens removal for 42% participants when wearing miniscleral contact lenses, compared to 68% in soft contact lens wearers [18]. This result is in accordance with the previously reported observation that larger limbal radius increases correspond with a longer recovery period [18].…”
Section: Minimum Absolute Change (μM) (Between Mb and M5)supporting
confidence: 91%
“…This value is slightly larger than that seen using silicone hydrogel soft contact lenses following the same protocol, which amounted on average to 130 ± 74 μm. [18]. The increase in limbal radius reverted to baseline values three hours after contact lens removal for 42% participants when wearing miniscleral contact lenses, compared to 68% in soft contact lens wearers [18].…”
Section: Minimum Absolute Change (μM) (Between Mb and M5)mentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To overcome these limitations we used corneo‐scleral profilometry, an alternative imaging technique able to simultaneously measure the cornea and the sclera in 3D along all meridians . Corneo‐scleral profilometry accounts for topographic changes in corneo‐scleral region when wearing soft and scleral lenses in both healthy and also compromised eyes . The ESP provides an RMS error of <10 μm for the central 8 mm area of a calibrated artificial surface and <40 μm for an extended measurement area of 16 mm …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Soft contact lenses (SCLs) make up approximately 90% of current fits and refits, and the rest include rigid or hybrid contact lenses [2]. Contact lens wear causes mutual interactions between the ocular surface and the lens, inducing mechanical, biological, and chemical mechanisms, including hypoxic stress, that are associated with discomfort and may lead to vision-threatening conditions [3,4]. Therefore, interaction between the eye and the contact lens impacts clinical tolerance of the lens.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%