1962
DOI: 10.1001/archopht.1962.00960020753010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Corneal Topography, Keratometry and Contact Lenses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1962
1962
1990
1990

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The recalculated power may be appropriate for the refracted beam entering the eye, but Goldberg's theme is the unsuitability of the keratometer for contact lens fitting, and insofar as the keratometer readings are correct, if they had been expressed in radius terms in the first instance then they would have been directly comparable with the lens radii of curvature according to current fitting procedures. Soper, Sampson and Girard (1962) and Sampson, Soper and Girard (1965) described a system of peripheral keratometry like that of Mandell for determining the extent of the optic cap, but they disregarded measurement errors completely and did not even quantify the change in power marking the boundary of the optic cap, merely defining the boundary as "the points on the corneal surface where the radius of curvature begins flattening." Black (1965), in discussion on the second of these papers, reported that in his experiments using a similar method, errors of 0.5 mm occurred in locating the position of areas of changing curvature, and that a keratometer could be considered to have an accuracy of 1/12D in power.…”
Section: B a J Clarkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The recalculated power may be appropriate for the refracted beam entering the eye, but Goldberg's theme is the unsuitability of the keratometer for contact lens fitting, and insofar as the keratometer readings are correct, if they had been expressed in radius terms in the first instance then they would have been directly comparable with the lens radii of curvature according to current fitting procedures. Soper, Sampson and Girard (1962) and Sampson, Soper and Girard (1965) described a system of peripheral keratometry like that of Mandell for determining the extent of the optic cap, but they disregarded measurement errors completely and did not even quantify the change in power marking the boundary of the optic cap, merely defining the boundary as "the points on the corneal surface where the radius of curvature begins flattening." Black (1965), in discussion on the second of these papers, reported that in his experiments using a similar method, errors of 0.5 mm occurred in locating the position of areas of changing curvature, and that a keratometer could be considered to have an accuracy of 1/12D in power.…”
Section: B a J Clarkmentioning
confidence: 99%