Abstract:Two sample groups of domestic cats were assessed for (a) central corneal thickness (17 eyes), using optical pachymetry, and (b) horizontal and vertical corneal diameter, using a photographic method (20 eyes). The average corneal thickness was 0.755 +/- 0.33 mm. The mean horizontal diameter was 16.5 +/- 0.60 mm and the mean vertical diameter was 16.2 +/- 0.61 mm. The horizontal corneal diameter was significantly greater than the vertical corneal diameter (p less than 0.001, paired t test).
“…The CCT of normal feline eyes in the current report was found to be 629.08 ± 47.05 μm, a value higher than previously reported in the majority of studies . Using ultrasonic pachymetry, Gilger et al .…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 67%
“…Carrington et al., however, found a mean CCT of 755 ± 30 μm using a slit‐lamp‐based optical pachymeter in nine healthy cats, whereas Kafarnik et al . reported the mean CCT of the feline eye to be 592 ± 80 μm using in vivo confocal microscopy . Such discrepancies within the veterinary literature regarding CCT of the feline eye largely reflect the imaging modality employed for data acquisition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CCT of normal feline eyes in the current report was found to be 629.08 AE 47.05 lm, a value higher than previously reported in the majority of studies. [17][18][19][20][21] 17,20 Such discrepancies within the veterinary literature regarding CCT of the feline eye largely reflect the imaging modality employed for data acquisition. Additionally, this variability is compounded by alterations in parameters utilized by each imaging modality.…”
“…The CCT of normal feline eyes in the current report was found to be 629.08 ± 47.05 μm, a value higher than previously reported in the majority of studies . Using ultrasonic pachymetry, Gilger et al .…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 67%
“…Carrington et al., however, found a mean CCT of 755 ± 30 μm using a slit‐lamp‐based optical pachymeter in nine healthy cats, whereas Kafarnik et al . reported the mean CCT of the feline eye to be 592 ± 80 μm using in vivo confocal microscopy . Such discrepancies within the veterinary literature regarding CCT of the feline eye largely reflect the imaging modality employed for data acquisition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CCT of normal feline eyes in the current report was found to be 629.08 AE 47.05 lm, a value higher than previously reported in the majority of studies. [17][18][19][20][21] 17,20 Such discrepancies within the veterinary literature regarding CCT of the feline eye largely reflect the imaging modality employed for data acquisition. Additionally, this variability is compounded by alterations in parameters utilized by each imaging modality.…”
“…47 Endothelial cell density 48,49 and corneal thickness values are comparable to human values. 50,51 The large corneal diameter of the cat cornea (15.5-18 mm) 48,52 permits full size grafts, using the same instrumentation and techniques as for human subjects. These large grafts also yield large amounts of tissue for postmortem analyses.…”
Section: Characteristics Of the Proposed Fecd Modelmentioning
Restoration of transparency and corneal thickness demonstrated that the TE-FECD grafts were functional in vivo. This novel FECD seven-day living model suggests a potential role for tissue engineering leading to FECD cell rehabilitation.
“…In their recent paper on the thickness and diameter of the cat cornea, Carrington and Woodward (1986) state that Valentin (1879) found a value of 1.3795 for the refractive index of the cat cornea, although they themselves used a value of 1.376. They went on to conclude, on the basis of the work of Arner and Rengstorff (1972), that large variations in the corneal refractive index would have to occur before any significant error was produced in the accuracy of pachometry.…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.