2016
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.15-18764
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Corneal Resistance to Keratolysis After Collagen Crosslinking With Rose Bengal and Green Light

Abstract: Crosslinking with RGX increased corneal resistance to digestion by collagenase comparable to that produced by riboflavin and UVA treatment.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…8 Another determining factor of success is penetration of rose bengal into the cornea. Rose bengal, like other photosensitizers, has limited diffusion into the cornea (~100–150um).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 Another determining factor of success is penetration of rose bengal into the cornea. Rose bengal, like other photosensitizers, has limited diffusion into the cornea (~100–150um).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The safety of the treatment was demonstrated through histological analyses showing no thermal damage to retina and iris cells of rabbits after PTB in vivo. 28 Over recent years, more studies on the comparison between collagen crosslinking induced by photo-activated riboflavin and RB on ex vivo and in vivo efficacy, 29 corneal healing response, 30 and collagenase degradation 31 have been performed, showing that treatment with photo-activated RB is more effective than with riboflavin. Based on these results, photo-activated RB to crosslink corneal tissue is considered an attractive therapeutic approach for keratoconus and other disorders and its clinical application in humans should be explored in the near future.…”
Section: Photo-and Sono-activated Rose Bengalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the time lag for full digestion of untreated control samples in our study is in line with previous publications, direct comparison should consider differences in treatment protocols and available information regarding study parameters-in particular the enzymatic activity of the applied assay. 12,21,22 Therefore we chose to directly compare WST/NIR and RF/UVA CXL. All four formulations showed a very strong reduced rate of enzymatic digestion after treatment, indicating the keratolytic resistance of both RF/UVA and WST/NIR derived corneal stiffening.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%