2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2017.07.036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Corneal remodeling after implantation of a shape-changing inlay concurrent with myopic or hyperopic laser in situ keratomileusis

Abstract: After concurrent LASIK and inlay implantation, the visual acuity, induced add-power profile, and epithelial remodeling were the same, regardless of hyperopic or myopic treatment.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The surgical placement of a corneal meniscus shaped inlay beneath a corneal flap alters the stroma anterior to the inlay to adopt predominately the inlay's shape (Lang et al, 2016). The epithelium remodels within a zone approximately twice the inlay diameter (Lang et al, 2016), with ~19 microns of central (~1 mm radius) central thinning regardless of the refractive error treated (Steinert et al, 2017). One disadvantage of the monocular approach of implanting inlays to increase the depth of focus of the visual system is the resulting anisocoria creates an imbalance in the retinal illuminances between the two eyes.…”
Section: Inlaysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The surgical placement of a corneal meniscus shaped inlay beneath a corneal flap alters the stroma anterior to the inlay to adopt predominately the inlay's shape (Lang et al, 2016). The epithelium remodels within a zone approximately twice the inlay diameter (Lang et al, 2016), with ~19 microns of central (~1 mm radius) central thinning regardless of the refractive error treated (Steinert et al, 2017). One disadvantage of the monocular approach of implanting inlays to increase the depth of focus of the visual system is the resulting anisocoria creates an imbalance in the retinal illuminances between the two eyes.…”
Section: Inlaysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the clinical outcomes were the same between the LASIK groups, with differences less than 2 Snellen letters between the two groups. A limitation of this study is that the average SE ablation was +1.71 D for hyperopic treatment and -2.48 D for myopic treatment [10]. Whether or not this remodeling effect is consistent with higher levels of treatment has yet to be elucidated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%