2017
DOI: 10.1111/aos.13518
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Corneal confocal sub‐basal nerve plexus evaluation: a review

Abstract: The aim of this study was to review the most recent data about corneal sub-basal nerve plexus (SNP) evaluated with the use of corneal confocal microscopy (CCM). For this purpose, an electronic search was conducted based on PubMed and Google Scholar and Web of Science databases from 2008 up to the end of 2016. Ninety-eight articles in English were cited, as well as abstracts in other languages, concerning the morphology and function of corneal SNP in various diseases. Changes in corneal SNP as a result of local… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 92 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, we found, accordingly to other reports, that there were no differences between the left and right eye nor between genders in the IVCM parameters 2,3,[7][8][9][10][11][12][13]20,21,30,31 .…”
Section: Snp Parametersupporting
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Finally, we found, accordingly to other reports, that there were no differences between the left and right eye nor between genders in the IVCM parameters 2,3,[7][8][9][10][11][12][13]20,21,30,31 .…”
Section: Snp Parametersupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The SCCM and the LSCM are currently still in use, and both provide a high quality of nerve imaging 8 . However, to perform a comparative analysis of nerve characteristics in different groups, the same device must be used to avoid erroneous interpretation [1][2][3] . Nevertheless numerous studies on normal corneal SBNP nerves were conducted to the best of our knowledge there are no reports on the relation between SBNP morphology and density and corneal parameters and refraction in healthy eyes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Based on the translational potential of CCM, in 2005, we proposed that quantification of the sub‐basal nerves using CCM may act as a surrogate marker of DPN . Since then, a burgeoning literature has irrefutably confirmed that CCM fulfils the Food and Drug Administration‐National Institutes of Health criteria as a biomarker for peripheral neuropathy . More recently, several studies have reported sub‐basal nerve alterations in central neurological disorders.…”
Section: Corneal Confocal Microscopy: a Brief History And Introductiomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Current options for in vivo corneal imaging include confocal microscopy and optical coherence tomography (OCT). Confocal microscopy has been used extensively to investigate the corneal nerves in vivo [21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30], and in the context of studying the changes induced with diabetes mellitus on corneal nerves in humans, mice and rats [19,[31][32][33][34][35][36]. Patients with diabetes had reduced densities of major corneal nerves and nerve branching, as well as increased tortuosity [31,32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%