2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.07.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Corneal collagen crosslinking for keratoconus and corneal ectasia: One-year results

Abstract: No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned. Additional disclosure is found in the footnotes.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

28
303
3
19

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 404 publications
(362 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
28
303
3
19
Order By: Relevance
“…The effect of CXL found in our patients with regard to improved visual acuity and reduced keratometry is very similar to all other studies investigating the effect of CXL with epithelial removal in KC patients. [2][3][4]11,12 An important objective of this study was to assess the risk of adverse events after CXL. Despite the overall enthusiasm for offering CXL to KC patients, adverse events have been incompletely assessed in the literature.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The effect of CXL found in our patients with regard to improved visual acuity and reduced keratometry is very similar to all other studies investigating the effect of CXL with epithelial removal in KC patients. [2][3][4]11,12 An important objective of this study was to assess the risk of adverse events after CXL. Despite the overall enthusiasm for offering CXL to KC patients, adverse events have been incompletely assessed in the literature.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Corneal cross-linking (CXL) using riboflavin and ultraviolet-A light has been shown to effectively increase corneal stiffness and even to reduce ectasia. [2][3][4] These findings originate from studies done mainly in young adults and led to the widespread use of CXL to stabilize KC in this group of patients, who have a 20% risk of progressing to a stage that requires therapeutic keratoplasty.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After diagnosis, we are currently monitoring six monthly for 2 years with annual review subsequently. More frequent initial monitoring 14,18,21 Excluding one study 18 in which control eyes were crossed over to treatment after just 3 months, we combined 1-year post-CXL keratometric and acuity outcome data for patients (n ¼ 31) in the remaining two trials. Clinically significant ectatic progression (increase in Kmax Z1D at 12 months) was observed in 32% untreated control eyes and 3% eyes treated with CXL (P ¼ 0.01, z-test); whereas significant regression (decrease in KmaxZ1D at 12 months) was seen in 45% of CXL treated eyes and 10% untreated control eyes (P ¼ 0.005, z-test) (Figures 1a and b).…”
Section: Defining Disease Progression-monitoring Keratoconusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spontaneous disease regression does not normally occur in keratoconus, and apparent disease regression (decrease in KmaxZ1D) in 10% of control eyes in RCTs may simply reflect limitations in measurement accuracy for contemporary topographers 16 -a problem compounded by corneal warpage in rigid contact lens Table 2 Criteria for keratoconus progression vs baseline measurement used in contemporary clinical trials of corneal collagen crosslinking 14,18,21 Kmax Z1D increase Kmax À Kmin Z1D increase Kmean Z0.75D increase Pachymetry Z2% decrease in CCT Corneal apex power 41D increase MRSE 40.5D wearers. These limitations and varying inclusion criteria (Table 2) in contemporary studies underline the problem of defining disease progression in keratoconus and defining thresholds for intervention.…”
Section: Defining Disease Progression-monitoring Keratoconusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Problems may range from relatively mild irregular astigmatism that may be corrected by rigid contact lenses to severe visual disability requiring keratoplasty. 1,2 Corneal ectasia may be caused by keratoconus or may be iatrogenic after laser vision correction among other causes, but the common final pathway is a loss of integrity of the corneal structure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%