2014
DOI: 10.5301/ejo.5000378
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Corneal Biomechanical Parameters during Pregnancy

Abstract: Hormonal changes during pregnancy may not affect corneal biomechanics. This may be due to the balanced effect of the various hormones on the cornea during pregnancy.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
19
1
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
6
19
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This effect does not have any influences on normal corneas; however, it affects weakened corneas such as keratoconic or postrefractive laser surgery corneas (Spoerl et al +3.20* À0.80 +4.00* À11.29%* À2.75* CCT = central corneal thickness; D = dioptre; K = keratometry; Max = maximum; Min = minimum; MRSE = manifest refraction spherical equivalent. In contrast, Goldich et al (2014) and Sen et al (2014) did not report CH and CRF values to be significantly different in pregnant and non-pregnant normal women. The results of criterion 5 (corneal apex power ≥ 1 D increase) were similar to the criterion 3 (mean K ≥ 0.75 D increase) and, therefore, were not included in the table.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This effect does not have any influences on normal corneas; however, it affects weakened corneas such as keratoconic or postrefractive laser surgery corneas (Spoerl et al +3.20* À0.80 +4.00* À11.29%* À2.75* CCT = central corneal thickness; D = dioptre; K = keratometry; Max = maximum; Min = minimum; MRSE = manifest refraction spherical equivalent. In contrast, Goldich et al (2014) and Sen et al (2014) did not report CH and CRF values to be significantly different in pregnant and non-pregnant normal women. The results of criterion 5 (corneal apex power ≥ 1 D increase) were similar to the criterion 3 (mean K ≥ 0.75 D increase) and, therefore, were not included in the table.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…In the present study, CH and CRF values were significantly decreased during the pregnancy. In contrast, Goldich et al (2014) and Sen et al (2014) did not report CH and CRF values to be significantly different in pregnant and non-pregnant normal women. However, Goldich et al (2011) found a decrease in CH and CRF values during menstrual and ovulation cycle, which may be associated with higher levels of oestrogen at the time of ovulation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Glaucoma: Glaucoma is another preexisting disease modified by pregnancy. As mentioned earlier, intraocular pressure is decreased during pregnancy [11][12][13][14][15]. Intraocular pressure decreases during the second trimester and continues to decrease with the advancing pregnancy [13].…”
Section: Effect Of Pregnancy On Preexisting Ocular Disordersmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Intraocular pressure can also be affected. It can be significantly decreased during pregnancy [12][13][14][15].…”
Section: Physiologic Changesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of the balanced effect of the various hormones on the cornea during pregnancy, corneal biomechanics may not be changed. [14] In addition, hormone replacement therapy and lifetime estrogen and progesterone exposure do not seem to affect IOP or the risk for increased IOP. [15] In another study, protective role of female hormones was mentioned in women with primary open angle glaucoma (POAG).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%