1976
DOI: 10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(76)84461-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Corn Silage Supplementation for Maximum Intake and Milk Production

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

1980
1980
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A quadratic response was observed for apparent digestibility of NDF (P < 0.05) and ADF (P < 0.01) and digestibility was greatest when all of the dietary forage was provided by either RS or CS instead of a blend of CS and RS. Montgomery et al (1976) reported lower CP digestibility for diets based on CS compared with those based on a blend of CS and alfalfa hay or low-moisture alfalfa silage. This decrease may be partially due to corn grain from the corn silage that passes through the reticulorumen to the lower tract without being digested.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A quadratic response was observed for apparent digestibility of NDF (P < 0.05) and ADF (P < 0.01) and digestibility was greatest when all of the dietary forage was provided by either RS or CS instead of a blend of CS and RS. Montgomery et al (1976) reported lower CP digestibility for diets based on CS compared with those based on a blend of CS and alfalfa hay or low-moisture alfalfa silage. This decrease may be partially due to corn grain from the corn silage that passes through the reticulorumen to the lower tract without being digested.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Although DMI was not significantly different among treatments, intake of DM was numerically higher for the diets containing 65 and 100% RS, which explains part but not all of the milk yield response to increasing RS. Montgomery et al (1976) ported lower DMI and milk yield for cows fed diets based on CS compared with that of cows fed blend of CS and alfalfa hay or low-moisture silage. Colenbrander et al (1986) reported lower DMI as a percentage of BW for cows fed CS compared with either alfalfa silage or a blend of CS and alfalfa silage, but milk yield was similar for all treatments.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Vor allem zu Beginn der Laktation kann dies von Nachteil sein, da die höchste Milchleistung nicht mit dem Zeitpunkt des höchsten Futterverzehrs zusammen fällt und dies oft zu einem mehr oder weniger deutlichen Energiedefizit führt (Butler und Smith 1989). Eine Kompensation der geringeren Energiedichte durch eine höhere Futteraufnahme bei einem Einsatz von Luzernesilage in Mischrationen ist jedoch denkbar, weil die Einbeziehung von Luzernesilage in die Ration in anderen Untersuchungen einen Anstieg in der Futteraufnahme bewirkte (Montgomery et al. 1976; Dhiman und Satter 1997; Hoffman et al.…”
Section: Einführungunclassified